This is a collection of:
- Submissions to the Courts
- Legal Opinions which have been requested
| VOLUME-1 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Student Union vs. Delhi University- Submission based on and to supplement Arguments made by Shri Fali S. Nariman and Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 1-46 |
| 2. | Opinion: Gujarat. Coop. Milk Mktg. Fedn vs. Krishi Utpadan Bazar Samiti Mussalahpur | 47-50 |
| 3. | Memorandum Drafted: implementation of the Intl. Labour Orgn.’s Compendium of Principles and Good Practices relating to Employment and Professional Worker NCOA. | 51-76 |
| 4. | Opinion: USA vs. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg). | 77-102 |
| 5. | Submission: Student Union vs. Delhi University and Rahul Kapoor vs. St. Stephen College. | 103-117 |
| 6. | Opinion: Brenda Council. | 118-163 |
| 7. | Opinion: Shiv Dayal Gupta Agencies (P) Ltd. | 164-168 |
| 8. | Opinion/ Memorandum- The National Thermal Corporation. | 169-176 |
| 9. | Opinion: Padmavati Solvent Oil Ltd. Vs. SBI. | 177-190 |
| 10 | Opinion: Banwasi Seva Ashram vs. U.P. | 191-197 |
| VOLUME-2 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: A.S.Ojha vs. Delhi University (CWP of 1993) | 1-3 |
| 2. | Opinion: Re: 49/1 Friends Colony. | 4-11 |
| 3. | Opinion: GATT Proposal Uruguay round (State vs. UOI ) | 12-22 |
| 4. | Opinion: Re: Form of the warranty under the PFA (Gujarat Milk Marketing) | 23-38 |
| 5 | DELHI University Student Union vs. St. Stephen College (WP No.13123-24/1990) | 39-41 |
| 6. | Opinion: in the matter of levy of excise o frozen peas. | 42-43 |
| 7. | Submission: Hindustan Zinc vs. A.P. State Electricity Board (CA2567 OF 1985). | 44-50 |
| 8. | Opinion: Gujarat Co-operation Milk Marketing Fedn. Vs. Krishi Utpadan Bazar Samiti. | 51-54 |
| 9. | Opinion: Re: Ronald lan Butfoy | 55-56 |
| 10 | Opinion: on legality of Recruitment, Promotion and Career Growth in Coca Cola India. | 57-109 |
| 11 | Opinion: Re: Regency Industries. | 110-111 |
| 12 | Opinion: Sivananda School. | 112 |
| 13 | Opinion: ESI Matter; Cuttack depot, Gujarat Co-operation Milk Mar Fedn. | 113-117 |
| 14 | Latter to Tarun Bharat Sangh Re: The Alwar Mining Case | 118-119 |
| 15 | Pearey Lal & Sons. vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce Ltd. Suit 1026of 1986 | 120 |
| 16 | Opinion: Banwasi Seva Ashram vs. State of U.P. | 121-125 |
| 17 | Opinion: Dy Register University of Delhi, post-doctoral courses. | 126-130 |
| 18 | A Report on the sale of BEL’s Taloja TV bulb by the Pilsarc | 131-141 |
| 19 | Submission: corporate Executives Association of NTPC vs. UOI | 142-144 |
| 20 | Black People in Britain: the way forward Examination of Witnesses. | 145-155 |
| 21 | Selct Committee on Race Relation and Immigration. | 156-159 |
| 22 | Submission: PK .Goel vs. Medical Council, U.P. Lucknow. | 160-167 |
| 23 | S.N. Mukherjee vs. UOI(Propositions on Behalf of the UOI) | 168-181 |
| 24 | Submission :Deepak Sibal vs. Punjab University | 182-190 |
| VOLUME-3 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Preliminary Submission: Pearey Lal & Sons.Ltd. vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce Ltd. | 1-13 |
| 2. | Submission: Sreenarayana Dharma Paropalana Yogam vs. UOI. | 14-23 |
| 3. | Opinion: Application of the Employees’ State Insurance Act. 1984. | 24-36 |
| 4. | Submission: A.R. Antulay vs. R.S.Nayak. | 37-51 |
| 5. | Submission: Hindustan Zinc vs. A.P. State Electricity Board | 52-147 |
| 6. | List of Submission: Corporate Executives Association of NTPC vs. UOI | 148-215 |
| 7. | Submission: C.P.Kalra vs. Air India. | 216-226 |
| 8. | Submission: Banwasi Seva Ashram vs. U.P. | 227-230 |
| 9. | Uganda Asian case: on the feasibility of the application of the Race Relations Act. 1976. | 231-244 |
| 10 | Reaction to the arguments of the super twit who is arguing the case for the Foreign Commonwealth office. | 245-247 |
| 11 | Submission: Sashi Kumar Sinha vs. State of Bihar. | 248-252 |
| 12 | Submission: Harpal Singh Chauhan vs. State of U.P. | 253-258 |
| VOLUME-4 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: The National Confederation of Officers; Associations. | 1-24 |
| 2. | Aide-de memorie of a Conference with Shri V.P. Kapoor Dty. Reg. of University College of Medical Science on 16 june, 1991. | 25-29 |
| 3. | Submission: Addl Secretary to the GOI vs. Alka Subhash Gadia. | 30-41 |
| 4. | Notes: Rawalgaon (Sugar Industry) | 42-50 |
| 5. | Opinion: Engineering Prodect (India) Ltd. | 51-54 |
| 6. | Re: College of Vacation Studies (Shri Panwar, Acting Principal). | 55-56 |
| 7. | Opinion: State Trading Corporation of India. | 67-98 |
| 8. | Re: Banwasi Land Case (Preliminary Note) | 99-104 |
| 9. | Opinion: Delhi Public Library | 105-108 |
| 10 | Tarun Bharat Sangh vs. State. | 109-111 |
| 11 | Opinion: Gujarat Co-operation Milk Marketing Fedn .Ltd. | 112-133 |
| 12 | Submission: Sanjay Kaushish vs. DC Kaushish. | 134-177 |
| 13 | Compilation: Tarun Bharat Sangh vs. UOI | 178-188 |
| 14 | Submission: Smt. Shrit Dhawan vs. Shaw Brother. | 189-227 |
| 15 | Submission: A.R. Antulay vs. R.S.Nayak. | 228-251 |
| 16 | Re: Simbhaoli | 252-257 |
| 17 | Submission: Shri Rajan Gupta vs. A.F. Forguson & Co. | 258-264 |
| 18 | Submission: Smt. Shrit Dhawan vs. Shaw Brother. | 265-272 |
| 19 | Submission: Dr. Amal Kanti Sen vs. Chairman Board of Research Studies for the Faculty of Medical Science University | 273-282 |
| VOLUME-5 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission : Sreenarayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam vs. UOI | |
| 2. | Scope of these Submissions. | 1-3 |
| 3. | The Mandate of Equality: A Fundamental Fallacy Considered | 4-8 |
| 4. | Classifications and Reservation by Sources. | 9-53 |
| 5. | Forbidden classification: is the Constitution blind to caste. | 53-67 |
| 6. | Difference between positive action and positive discrimination. | 67-84 |
| 7. | Reservation in State Employment: A Collective Right. | 84-96 |
| 8. | Efficiency: Competence and Merit. | 96-109 |
| VOLUME-6 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Dr. G.D.Goel vs. National Dispute Rederessal Commission. | 1-65 |
| 2. | Submission: Bhartiya Kaumi Ekta Mandal special ref. No. 1of 1993. | 66-155 |
| 3. | Opinion: Privatizing Indian Airlines Routes. | 156-176 |
| 4. | Opinion: retail Tenancy in Ajmal Khan Road. | 177-182 |
| 5. | Submission: Oriental Power Cable Ltd. Vs. BIFR. | 183-196 |
| 6. | Submission: State of U.P. vs. Bist Industrial Corporation | 197-204 |
| 7. | Re: Kamal Khanna Partition suit 205-207 | 205-207 |
| 8. | Submission: Maharashtra Kamagar Union vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. The Tata Mills co. Ltd. | 208-265 |
| 9. | HPS Chawla vs. Mrs. Nirmal Daniere Suit No. 1106 of 1992 | 266-269 |
| 10 | Supplementary Submission: A.S.Ojha vs. Delhi University | 270-281 |
| 11 | Opinion: Films and Clips. | 282 |
| 12 | Re: Kripal Ispat Ltd. Gorakhpur. | 283 |
| VOLUME-7 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1 | Preliminary outline of Submission: the Draft Final treaty of the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement of the trade and tariffs (GATT) | 1-194 |
| VOLUME-8 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| Sariska | ||
| 1. | Submission: Tarun Bharat Sangh vs. Union of India | 1-145 |
| VOLUME-9 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | BABRI MASJID | |
| 2. | Submission: Bhartiya Kaumi Ekta Dal Special Reference No.1. White paper on Ayodhya, Government of India, February 1993. | 1-298 |
| VOLUME-10 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| GATT TREATY (URUGUAY ROUND) | ||
| 1. | Opinion: on whether the States have a case against the Union of India with respect to signing the GATT Treaty (Uruguay Round) | 1-379 |
| VOLUME-11 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: on the implication of GATT for the citizens of India This is opinion was written in two stage: (a) Opinion on the Dunkel Draft. (b) Update Opinion on the final treaty of Dec.1993 Note: Although the Opinion is in the form of a petition, it is in fact an Opinion. The form was to save time. | 1-226 |
| VOLUME-12 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Maharashtra Kamagar Union vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. The Tata Mills co. Ltd. and supplementary Submission | 1-76 |
| 2. | Banwasi Seva Ashram vs. State of U.P. WP (Cri.) 1062 of 1982. | 77-78 |
| 3. | Preliminary Submission on MRTP. | 79-88 |
| 4. | Submission: A.S.Ojha vs. Delhi Universality. | 89-98 |
| 5. | Reference to American Jurisprudence. | 99-109 |
| 6. | Mr. Justice Mahendra Narain- Constituent Assembly. | 110-115 |
| 7. | On the Consumer Protection Act. 1986. | 116-119 |
| 8. | Opinion: Gujarat Co-operation Milk Marketing Fedn. | 120-124 |
| 9. | Submission: CERS and Harashda Shah vs. LIC | 125-150 |
| VOLUME-13 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | BABRI MASJID | |
| 2. | Compilation of Material Supplement on materials cites in support of proposition on behalf of the Bhartiya Kaumi Ekta Mandal. | 1-61 |
| VOLUME-14 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| Compilation on Maintainability Re : Special reference No. 1 of 1993 | ||
| A. | India: | |
| (a) Federal Court | 5-28 | |
| (b) Supreme Court | 29-76 | |
| B. | (a) Canada | 77-147 |
| (b) England | 148-156 | |
| (c) Australia | 157-183 | |
| VOLUME-15 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | The Acquisition of Areas in Ayodhya Act. (33of) 1993 | 1-131 |
| 2. | Submission: Bhartiya Kaumi Ekta Mandal vs. Union of India (Reference and compilation of Material) | |
| VOLUME-16 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | The Acquisition of Areas in Ayodhya Act.1993 | |
| 2. | Submission: Bhartiya Kaumi Ekta Mandal vs. Union of India (Reference and compilation of Material) | 1-281 |
| VOLUME-17 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Propositions- P. Thayumanan vs. Union of India | 1-9 |
| 2. | Re: Prospecting in Reserved Forests and National Parks. | 10-15 |
| 3. | A.S.Ojha vs. Delhi Universality. | 16-24 |
| 4. | Re: B.K. Kapur vs. P.D. Gupta | 25-28 |
| 5. | Election Commission of India (Janta Dal) Dispute No. 1.of 1994 | 29-34 |
| 6. | Submission: Maharashtra General Kanagar Union vs. HLL TOMCO. | 35-121 |
| 7. | Final Act. Embodying the results of the Uruguay round of Multilateral trade negations and in the matter of the sovereignty and integrity of India. Submission to the people’s Commission on GATT. | 122-141 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re: B.K.Kapur | 142-144 |
| 9. | Submission: Smt. Raj BAI vs. Harpal Singh. | 145-151 |
| 10 | On the status quo interpretation of the Acquisition of Certain Area Act.1993 | 152-154 |
| 11 | Opinion: on DLG Marketing, Chandigarh Gambhir Traders, Sharanpur. | 155-164 |
| 12 | Opinion: In the form of a legal notice Mrs. Veena Kapur. | 165-467 |
| 13 | Submission: IARI vs. Union of India. | 168-172 |
| 14 | A.S.Ojha vs. Delhi Universality. | 173-174 |
| 15 | Election Commission of India Dispute No. 1.of 1994 (Janta Dal) | 175-180 |
| 16 | Propositions- P. Thayumanan vs. Union of India | 181-189 |
| 17 | Re: MTNL Case | 190-191 |
| 18 | Submission: Mr. Justice S.K. Keshote vs. Vinay Chandra Mishra | 192-201 |
| VOLUME-18 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. consumer Education and Research Centre | 1-44 |
| 2. | Submission: Satara Skhari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. State of Maharashtra. | 45-79 |
| 3. | Opinion: Pearey Lal & Sons. Vs. Land and Development Officer. | 80-91 |
| 4. | Submission: Satara Skhari Karkhana Ltd. State of Maharashtra. | 92-98 |
| 5. | Submission: R.K. Sabharwal vs. State of Punjab | 99-112 |
| 6. | Submission: Smt. Vasantha P.Nair vs. Consumer Education and Research Society. | 113-150 |
| 7. | Submission: Sudip Mauzumdar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh | 151-162 |
| 8. | Submission: The federation OF Tata Oil Mills and Allied companies Employees Union vs. Tata Mills Company Ltd. | 163-176 |
| 9. | Submission: Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.K .Keshote vs. Vinay Chandra Mishra | 177-189 |
| VOLUME-19 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: P. Thayumanan vs. Union of India CUTS vs. State of Rajasthan | 1-138 |
| 2. | Submission: Mrs. Lata Chauhan and Mrs. Hemlata Singh vs. the Bist Industrial Corp. Ltd. And Sh. W.L.Kohli | 139-143 |
| 3. | Reply to the Queries: Satara Skhari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. State of Maharashtra. | 144-179 |
| 4. | Submission: P. Thayumanan vs. Union of India | 180-182 |
| 5. | Re: Om Marbles | 183-199 |
| 6. | Monisha Kapoor Dhavan vs. Presh Kapur | 200-210 |
| 7. | Opinion: Soumendu Bagchi VS. Union of India | 211-212 |
| 8. | Opinion: Teachers Training College in Kerala | 213-215 |
| 9. | Amending the patents Act. 1970 in the light of the GATT Negotiations. | 216-225 |
| 10 | Re: Accident of a Truck carrying benzene | 226-227 |
| 11 | Re: Atrium Magic Software Agreement. | 228-233 |
| 12 | Submission: Union of India vs. Budh Singh | 234-244 |
| 13 | In the matter of the quashing of criminal proceedings (Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee. | 245-328 |
| VOLUME-20 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | P. Thayumanan vs. Union of India and Cosmopolitan Hospital P. Nair (Compilation on negligence Tort Law in India, Professional Misconduct ET. Al.) | 1-460 |
| A | Materials on liability for Professional Negligence. | 1-149 |
| B | I. On the Definition of “Service”. | 150-173A |
| II On the Inclusion of Doctors and Hospitals under COPRA. | 174-280 | |
| III On the Ouster of Jurisdiction. | 281-339 | |
| IV On the Legal Duty of Doctors | 340-359 | |
| V On Frivolous and Vexations Suits and Consumer Fora | 360-403 | |
| VI English cases on Medical Negligence relied on by Opposing Counsel | 404-460 | |
| VOLUME-21 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1 | Compilation: Bal Ram Kumawat vs. Union of India (Extinction etc) | 1-409 |
| VOLUME-22 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Board proposal to Secretary Council of India for establishment of State Level Press Council in Uttar Pradesh. | 1-10 |
| 2. | Submission: St. Pauls Educational Dev. Committee. Vs. Government of A.P. | 11-25 |
| 3. | Opinion: Nursing in B.L. Kapoor Medical Hospital. | 26-28 |
| 4. | Legal Notice: Joint Secretary (Education) Post of Vice Principle. | 29-33 |
| 5. | Submission: Dr. J.N.Banwalikar vs. Municipal Corp. of Delhi Promotion case | 34-50 |
| 6. | Memorandum to the President of India From N.T Rama Rao. | 51-58 |
| 7. | Re: Mulayam Singh (Singh Akilesh vs. State of U.P.) | 59-67 |
| 8. | Submission: Rajiv Teota vs. State of U.P. | 68-72 |
| 9. | Opinion: Sahmat | 73-74 |
| 10. | In the Matter of the quashing of Criminal | 75 |
| 11 | Submission: Union of India vs. Budh Singh | 76-99 |
| 12 | Submission: St. Pauls Educational Dev. Committee. Vs. Government of A.P. | 100-114 |
| 13 | Compilation: Pashim Banga Khet Major Samaty vs. State of West Bengal. | 115-125 |
| 14 | Opinion: CERS vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corp. | 126-129 |
| 15 | Opinion: Bail and the SC and ST Act.1989 | 130-131 |
| 16 | Comments: Re-Shree Sarvodya Co-op Bank Ltd. | 132-135 |
| 17 | Writ Petition (Civil) TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka. | 136-141 |
| 18 | Facts: Puri Construction (P)Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh | 142-153 |
| 19 | Memorandum: Bombay Environmental Action Group vs. State of Maharashtra. | 154-158 |
| 20 | Opinion: on aspects of TADA to Amnesty International (UK) | 159 |
| 21 | Opinion: P.K.Jain | 160 |
| 22 | Opinion: Rami Chhabra’s Social Watch. | 161-171 |
| 23 | Speech of C.M. in Convension of National Federation of Working Journalists | 172-196 |
| VOLUME-23 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Rathong Chu Hyder Project | 1-10 |
| 2. | Submission: Chukie Tobden vs. Union of India | 11-22 |
| 3. | Submission: Bal Ram Kumawat vs. Union of India | 23-31 |
| 4. | A Legal Aide-de-memorie-the ‘merit Promotion’ in Universities. Judgment. | 32-92 |
| 5. | Submission: Rajiv Teota vs. State of U.P. | 93-106 |
| 6. | Submission: Union of India vs. Vir Pal Chauhan | 107-108 |
| 7. | Rajiv Teota vs. State of U.P. Compilation on behalf of the State of U.P. | 109-121 |
| 8. | Re-Shree Sarvodya Co-op Bank Ltd. | 122-124 |
| 9. | Re: Mithilesh Kumar. | 125 |
| 10 | Re: Vohra Committee case | 126-131 |
| VOLUME-24 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| Accelerated Seniority | ||
| 1. | Submission: Union of India vs. Vir Pal Chauhan | 1-112 |
| VOLUME-25 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P | 1-16 |
| 2. | Submission: Pashim Banga Khet Major Samaty vs. State of West Bengal. | 17-18 |
| 3. | Submission: Ichchapur Industrial Cooperative Society Ltd. Vs. Competent Authority, ONGC. | 19-28 |
| 4. | Opinion: To State of Tamil Nadu Re- Proceeding in Morocco | 29-30 |
| 5. | Re: Kapur Hospital | 31-34 |
| 6. | Ms. Chukie Tobden vs. Union of India Ref. – Chu-Hyder Project. | 35-41 |
| 7. | Opinion: Bombay Society of the Franciscan Sister of Mary | 42-51 |
| 8. | Preliminary Submission to the Rajya Sabha Committee on the Trade Marks Bill 1995. | 52-98 |
| 9. | Proposition- the Action of the Governor | 99-100 |
| 10 | Compilation: U.P. Legislative Assembly Proceeding and Rule 1958 | 101-107 |
| VOLUME-26 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | P.U.C.L vs. Union of India (Compilation of Materials). | 1-163 |
| a. Indian Compilation. | 1-20 | |
| b. U.K. Compilation. | 21-60 | |
| c. European Compilation. | 61-128 | |
| d. USA Compilation | 129-163 | |
| VOLUME-27 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| Phone Taping and Privacy 2: | ||
| 1. | P.U.C.L vs. Union of India Compilation of Materials. | 1-469 |
| 2. | Indian Case | 1-293 |
| 3. | American case | 294-469 |
| VOLUME-28 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Case Preliminary Volume: | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P Preliminary Compilation | 1-189 |
| VOLUME-29 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Volume-I. | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P Preliminary Compilation | 1-663 |
| 2. | Part-I- Indian Materials. | 1-534 |
| 3. | Part-II- Materials from other Countries. | 535-663 |
| VOLUME-30 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Volume-II | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P Compilation of materials Contend. (Part IV: Additional Material on Dissolution and Dismissal). | 671-790 |
| 2. | G. Wilson case and ,Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law (1966 Ed.) pp.231-35 | 671-685 |
| 3. | Hoot Constitutional and Administrative Law(1987Ed) pp.300-302 | 686-688 |
| 4. | R.Braxer : Constitutional Practice(1994) pp.192-3and 204-209 | 697-749 |
| 5. | S. Law: Governance of England (1906)pp.106-113 | 750-757 |
| 6. | Eraskine Ma: Parliamentary practice (1989) 21st Ed. Pp.558-571 | 758-771 |
| 7. | R. Venkatraman: My President years (1985). | 772-790 |
| VOLUME-31 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Volume-III | ||
| 1. | Supreme Court Judgment in Constitution Petition No. 8 of 1993 decided on 26th May, 1993. Mian Muhammad Nawaz Sharif –Petitioner vs. The President of Pakistan and Others Respondents | 473-894 |
| VOLUME-32 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Volume-IV | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P (Compilation- Further Commonwealth Materials. | 1-135 |
| 2. | Contents: Extracts from Eugene A. Forsey: The Royal Power of Dissolution of Parliament in the British Commonwealth (Oxford, 1944). | |
| VOLUME-33 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Volume-V | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P (Compilation Constitution Assembly Debates and related Materials). | 1-126 |
| VOLUME-34 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR Volume-VI | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P (Compilation Rules of the Andhra Legislature). | 1-223 |
| VOLUME-35 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NTR | ||
| 1. | Gorantla Butchaiah Choudhary vs. State of A.P (Preliminary Submission). | 1-137 |
| VOLUME-36 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: S.P. Gaur vs. The Liberahan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry (Compilation | 1-203 |
| VOLUME-37 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: S.P. Gaur vs. The Liberahan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry | 1-10 |
| 2. | Submission: Ajit Singh vs. State of Punjab and related Cases. | 11-29 |
| 3. | Gorantia Butchsish Cohwdhary vs., State of A.P. further Reference | 30-33 |
| 4. | Supp. Submission : Harbhajan Singh vs. State of Punjab | 34-38 |
| 5. | Submission: Chukie Tobden vs. UOI. | 39-184 |
| 6. | Submission: Gorantia Butchsish Cohwdhary vs., State of A.P. | 185-197 |
| VOLUME-38 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Chukie Tobden vs. UOI. | 1-12 |
| 2. | Opinion: IAS (Appointment by Promotion ) Regulation 1955 | 13-15 |
| 3. | The merger between Hindustan Liver Ltd. Vs. Tata Oil Mills. | 16-21 |
| 4. | Submission: P. Thayumanan vs. Union of India | 22-79 |
| 5. | Submission: Harbhajan Singh vs. State of Punjab. | 80-94 |
| 6. | Reply Affidavit- Gorantia Butchsish Cohwdhary vs., State of A.P. | 95-100 |
| 7. | Union to Sikkim- Project | 101-107 |
| 8. | Gorantia Butchsish Cohwdhary vs., State of A.P. | 108-218 |
| 9. | Opinion: Centre for Study of GATT issues. | 209 |
| 10 | Opinion: SC and ST Candidate in the matter of promotion. | 220-222 |
| VOLUME-39 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Chukie Tobden vs. UOI. (Compilation and Materials) | 1-281 |
| VOLUME-40 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Arguments and Compilation National Federation of Telecom Employees vs. UOI | 1-190 |
| VOLUME-41 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | LAY MAGISTRACY PADHADIYA CASE | |
| 2. | Kadar Pahadiya vs. State of Bihar write Petition (Criminal) No. 5943 of 1990 | 1-195 |
| VOLUME-42 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | RIGHT TO HEALTH | |
| 2. | Submission and Further Submission Pachim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity vs. State of West Bengal. | 1-187 |
| Annexures: a. International code of Medical Ethics. b. US Medical “Anti Dumping” Laws (USC42). c. Metropouls: Son of COBRA…”K. Treiger: Preventing Patient Dumping…” & Bitterman: “A Critical Analysis of the Federal COBRA List of relevant Indian cases. | ||
| VOLUME-43 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | SUBMISSION TO RAJAYA SABHA ON PATENTS (AMENDMENT BILL) | 1-201 |
| Memorandum to the Select Committee of Rajya Sabha on patents (Amendment) Bill-1995 Submission | ||
| VOLUME-44 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: State Bank of India Staff Association vs. State Bank of India | 1-36 |
| 2. | Submission: Puri Construction P. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. | 37-63 |
| 3. | Submission: National Federation of Telecom Employees vs. UOI | 64-100 |
| 4. | Opinion: Smt. M. Mahadevi vs. the State of Punjab. | 101-105 |
| 5. | Submission: Harbhajan Singh vs. State of Punjab | 106-118 |
| 6. | Re: Shri Mahendar Praksh Kapil. | 119-122 |
| 7. | Submission: in the matter of Ajit Singh and Harbhajan Singh. | 123-150 |
| 8. | Usha Mehta vs. State of Maharashtra- Propositions. | 151-154 |
| 9. | Submission: Chukie Tobden vs. UOI. | 155-161 |
| VOLUME-45 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Shard Pawar vs. Vinod Mehta. | 1-11 |
| 2. | Submission: National Federation of Telecom Employees vs. UOI | 12-50 |
| 3. | Opinion: Star Papers Mills Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board | 51-57 |
| 4. | Opinion: M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & in the matter of Hansa Paints and Chemicals. | 58-63 |
| 5. | The Draft SLP-on Parvati’s locus to file (NTR). | 64-69 |
| 6. | Draft latter by way of notice to State Bank of Patiala- Shri Ramesh C. Agarwal. | 70-71 |
| 7. | Arguments- National Federation of Telecom Employees vs. UOI | 72-94 |
| 8. | The Draft SLP-on Parvati’s locus to file (NTR). | 95-100 |
| 9. | Submission: Gorantia Butchsish Cohwdhary vs., State of A.P. | 101-110 |
| 10 | Opinion:/Settling- IAS (Appointment by Promotion ) Regulation 1955 | 111-116 |
| 11 | Settling of Counter Affidavit Genubhau vs. Deoji SLP-26996OF 1995. | 117-123 |
| 12 | Ouri Case in MP. | 124-127 |
| 13 | Submission: SBI Staff Association vs. SBI. | 128-144 |
| 14 | Opinion: Smt. Same Kumar. | 145-147 |
| 15 | Opinion: Genubhau vs. Deoji SLP-26996OF 1995. | 148-152 |
| 16 | Submission: on the Patents (Amendments) Bill 1995. | 153-156 |
| 17 | Opinion: M.C .Mehta vs. Union of India & in the matter of Hansa Paints and Chemicals. | 157-163 |
| VOLUME-46 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Amitabh Bachan Corporation Ltd. Vs. Om Pal Singh Hoon. | 1-24 |
| 2. | Criminal Legal Aid. | 25-33 |
| 3. | Submission: Puri Construction P. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. | 34-53 |
| 4. | Submission: Mohd. Azgruddin vs. Salaam M. Bawazier. | 54-61 |
| 5. | Submission: Amir Chand Singal vs. UOI, Khiali Ram vs. UOI. | 62-80 |
| 6. | Submission: Bhargav Bhushan Press vs. Bihar State Text Publishing Corpn. | 81-83 |
| 7. | Legal aid. | 84 |
| 8. | Submission: State through Supdt. Central Jail, Tihar vs. Ms. Charu Lata Joshi & Shard Saxena, India Today Magazine. | 85-89 |
| 9. | Submission: Puri Construction P. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. | 90-109 |
| 10 | Submission: PILSARC VS. Om Pal Singh Hoon. | 110-129 |
| 11 | Re: Mark and Spencer’s Child Labour case. | 130 |
| 12 | Comments on various proposals Kedra Pahadiya vs. State of Bihar. | 131-136 |
| 13 | Re: Outlook- reason for not granting Ad-interim Relief. | 137-141 |
| 14 | Submission: Rajasthan Sahkari Karamchari Sangh vs. State of Rajasthan. | 142-144 |
| 15 | Opinion: Star Papers Mills Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board | 145-147 |
| 16 | Review Petition – Union of India vs. Amar Singh. | 148 |
| 17 | Opinion: Bauxite mining in Rayagada District in A.P. | 149-150 |
| 18 | The affidavit of the General Kamagar Union for Suchitra Chitable. | 151 |
| 19 | Re: Bauxite mining in Rayagada District in A.P. | 152-153 |
| 20 | Submission: K.S. Aralikatti vs. Union of India. | 154-157 |
| 21 | Haryana State Adhyak Sangh vs. State of Haryana (Contempt Petition) . | 158 |
| 22 | Criminal Legal | 159 |
| 23 | Submission: St. Pauls Education Development Committee vs. Govt. of A.P. | 160-174 |
| 24 | Opinion: Pradip Krishan vs. Union of India. | 175-178 |
| 25 | Submission: State vs. Charu Lata Joshi. | 179-183 |
| 26 | Submission: K.S. Aralikatti vs. Union of India. | 184-187 |
| 27 | K.S. Aralikatti vs. Union of India, Punjab National Bank vs. All India New Bank if India Employees Federation. | 188-198 |
| 28 | Opinion: the Free Legal Aid Committee (FLAC) Jamshedpur. | 199-203 |
| 29 | Informal advice-Babloo Srivastav Case by Gopal Singh. | 204 |
| 30 | Re: Applicability of Suicide II- Geeta. | 205 |
| 31 | Baljit Kapur vs. Modi Land grabbing. | 206 |
| 32 | Priceless Children. | 207-213 |
| VOLUME-47 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Compilation: Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee vs. Union of India –Application for intervention on behalf of the application | 1-112 |
| VOLUME-48 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| SAMATHA CASE (STATUS) VOL-I | ||
| Compilation: Samatha vs. State of A.P. ( Compilation of status and Relevant Materials )Vol- I | ||
| A | Forest, Environment and Mining Legislations. | 1-163A |
| B. | On background to the Legislations. | 164-193 |
| C. | On Legal Personality and the Concept of a ‘Person’ | 194-215 |
| D. | Note on Extract from Indian Judgments on transferring common Law notions applicable in Private law to Public law | 216-217 |
| VOLUME-49 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| SAMTHA CASE (TRIBAL) VOL-II | ||
| Compilation: Samatha vs. State of A.P. (Compilation -2 in relation to Tribals Lands). | ||
| A | Note on the interpretation of Schedule V Para 5 of the Constitution, especially V (5) (2) (B) In respect of the allotment of Lands. | 1-5 |
| B | Present text of schedule V. | 6-9 |
| C | History of Schedule V and its antecedents. Shiva Rao, Farming of India’s Constitution Study Volume pp.569-91. | 10-33 |
| D | Material on Constitution Assembly. | 34-136A |
| VOLUME-50 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | SAMTHA CASE (FOREST LAND) VOL-I | |
| Samatha vs. State of A.P. compilation -3 (Case laws on Forest). | ||
| A | On meaning of Forest. | 1-67 |
| B | On Application of the FCA 1987 to Renewals. | 68-87 |
| C | On other aspects. | 88-90 |
| D | Judgments of High Court. | 91-130 |
| VOLUME-51 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Arguments, Submission, notes and Compilations of statutes and relevant materials: Samatha vs. State of Andhra Pradesh | 1-49 |
| VOLUME-52 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Mohammad Hashim vs. P.V. Narsimha Rao (Narsimha Rao Contempt Case). Preliminary compilation of historical material on the Contempt Power containing : Sanyal Report, Bhargva Report, Extract on the legislative proceeding from 1926-1971 and extract from VIII CAD 378-383 | 1-124 |
| VOLUME-53 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Arguments, Submission, notes and Compilations of statutes and relevant materials: Samatha vs. State of Andhra Pradesh. | 1-40 |
| 2. | Opinion: Lamb and Boh/ tham vs. Imran Khan | 41-48 |
| 3. | Opinion: Sikh Gurdwara, san Jose vs. India today | 49-52 |
| 4. | Submission: Mohd. Azhzruddin vs. Salaam M. Bawazier. | 53-60 |
| 5. | Opinion: Pradeep Krishan vs. Union of India. | 61-63 |
| 6. | Opinion: on the Pinatum Case. | 64-67 |
| 7. | Latter to Shri. Raj Chengappa India today. | 68 |
| 8. | Re: Settling of the reply to Charu Lata Joshi. | 69-73 |
| 9. | Re: Draft reliefs- Sanjay Karol. | 74-78 |
| 10 | Settling of Rejoinder in Subhash Chander Chubey vs. State of Choubey. | 79-81 |
| 11 | Re: Vinita’s seniority Gopal Singh. | 82-85 |
| 12 | Preliminary Opinion: on Cartain aspects of the Wild Life Act. | 86-87 |
| 13 | Opinion Settling: Re: Chandita Mukerjea. | 88-92 |
| 14 | Aid-de memorie Raj Chegappa, India today. | 93 |
| 15 | Submission: St. Pauls Education Development Committee of A.P. | 94-108 |
| VOLUME-54 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Amitabh Bachan Corp. Ltd. vs. Om Pal Singh Hoon (Compilation etc) – Bandit Queen Censorship Case. | 1-281 |
| VOLUME-55 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Ganga Prasad Dhore v. State of Bihar | 1-9 |
| 2. | Opinion: New Bank of India Employees Union vs. Union of India. | 10-15 |
| 3. | Submission: Smt. Kaushalya Behra vs. Chairman, Orissa State Electricity Board. | 16-20 |
| 4. | Submission: B.L.Wahera vs. Union of India latter to Justice Kuldeep Singh. | 21-55 |
| 5. | Opinion: G. Jayachandran vs. Arun Poori | 56-64 |
| 6. | Re: Article-262. | 65-66 |
| 7. | Compilation on Background to Article 262 Cmdr Sureshwar D. Sinha. | 67-116 |
| 8. | Submission: Ashish Kumar vs. State of Punjab. | 117-137 |
| 9. | Opinion: Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Labour. | 138-139 |
| 10 | Opinion: natural Lake studded area near Vasant Kaunj. | 140 |
| 11 | Re: Joint Action Council Kannur. | 141 |
| 12 | Settling of Rejoinder in Subhash Chander Chubey vs. State of Choubey. | 142-144 |
| 13 | SC Legal Aid Committee (Criminal Legal Aid) | 145 |
| 14 | In the matter of Harpal Singh- affidavit tendering apology. | 146-149 |
| 15 | Opinion Settling: Manchanda vs.Manchanda. | 150-154 |
| 16 | Opinion: South Asia Industries Ltd. | 155-159 |
| 17 | Latter to Sanjay Joshi of VANI- Cancellation of Registration. | 160-161 |
| 18 | Opinion: Ravi Nair Case. | 162 |
| 19 | Peer Mohd. Vs. Manmen Mathew –Reply | 163-171 |
| 20 | Submission: on Plight of Brick Kiln Onwers –Taj Trapezium. | 172-174 |
| VOLUME-56 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission and Compilation State of Punjab vs. Ashish Kumar Summary Case (Punjab Sanctions matter). | 1A-206 |
| VOLUME-57 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Compilation and Documents and Orders Thematic List of Date- Daya Singh vs. State of Rajasthan. | 1-175 |
| VOLUME-58 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Rajasthan State Transport Corporation vs. Smt. Poonam Pahwa. | 1-33 |
| 2 | Submission: B.L.Wadhera vs. Union of India. | 34-72 |
| 3. | Aide-de-memoire- Review of TADA Case. | 73-81 |
| 4. | Submission: Consumer Education and Research Society vs. UOI. | 82-94 |
| 5. | Letter: to VANI cancellation of Registration under Societies Regn. Act. 1860 | 95-96 |
| 6. | Submission: on Plight of Brick Kiln Onwers –Taj Trapezium. | 97-100 |
| 7. | Opinion: natural Lake studded area near Vasant Kaunj. | 101 |
| 8. | Submission: Hari Prasad vs. Trade Fair Authority of India (now ITPO). | 102-108 |
| 9. | Submission: Bhargava Bhushan Press vs. Bihar State Text Publishing Corp. | 109-111 |
| 10 | Submission: Ganga Prasad Dhore vs. State of Bihar. | 112-115 |
| 11 | ATMA vs. State of Assam –SLP no. 1996 and aftermath. | 116-119 |
| 12 | Meerut Development Authority vs. Satbir Singh- Further References. | 120 |
| 13 | Submission: State of Punjab vs. Vinod Kumar and Ashish Kumar. | 121-152 |
| 14 | List of Date –Daya Singh vs. State of Rajasthan (and other Documents). | 153-182 |
| 15 | Written Arguments. Dr. A. Krishen Rao vs. A.P. Pollution Control Board | 183-201 |
| VOLUME-59 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Final Written Submission and Cases Daya Singh vs. State of Rajasthan. | 1A-391 |
| VOLUME-60 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission and references and Compilation of statement of objects and reasons of various statutes Shri. T.N. Godaverman vs. UOI (Forest matters) | 1-165 |
| VOLUME-61 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Compilation of Statistical Data on Minorities TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka | 1A-97 |
| VOLUME-62 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Compilation of Statistical Data on Minorities TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka | 1A-97 |
| VOLUME-63 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Compilation on Constituent Assembly Debates and Committees .TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka | 1A-134 |
| VOLUME-64 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Detailed Submissions : TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka | 1A-150 |
| VOLUME-65 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Daya Singh vs. The State of Rajasthan. | 1-30 |
| 2. | Re: Review of Sheila Kaul’s case | 31-35 |
| 3. | Re: South Asia Industries (SAI) to settle the notice. | 36-40 |
| 4. | Letter Mr. Cobus Mulder, South Africa the Role of National Council of Provinces (NCOP) | 41-44 |
| 5. | Opinion: Cooper Foundary Pvt. Ltd. vs. S.N. Lele. | 45-55 |
| 6. | Letter Mr. Cobus Mulder, South Africa the Role of National Council of Provinces (NCOP) | 56-67 |
| 7. | Re: Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act. (FCA), 1980 Parmila Das. | 68-74 |
| 8. | Submission: Sri Adi Visheshwar of Kashi Viswantha vs. State of U.P. | 75-88 |
| 9. | Opinion: Ms. Nandana Reddy, Chairman, the Concerned for Working Children (CWC). | 89-90 |
| 10 | Re: BAT, ITC: The Anees Ahmad Petition. | 91-92 |
| 11 | Opinion: Sri M.G. Badappanavar vs. State of Karnataka. | 93-94 |
| 12 | Submission: Drug Dispensations by Ayurvedic and Unani Doctors. | 95-97 |
| 13 | Aide-de-memoire- Chief Secretary and Principle Conservator of Forests in Arunachal Pradesh. | 98-109 |
| VOLUME-66 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | In The Matter of Shri Adi Visheshwar of Kashi Viswantha vs. State of U.P. (CA) No. 1016/1987. | 1-155 |
| Compilation: Articles of the Classical Law of Religious Endowments and it’s Transformation by (A) British Indian Courts (B) Independent Indian Courts | ||
| VOLUME-67 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Final Submission: Samata vs. State of Andhra Pradesh. | 1-126 |
| VOLUME-68 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Further Compilation: Samata vs. State of Andhra Pradesh. | 1-106 |
| VOLUME-69 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| MINORITIES CASE-(Volume-VI) | ||
| 1. | Compilation of Statistical Data on Minorities-TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (Volume-V) | 1-107 |
| VOLUME-70 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| MINORITIES CASE-(Volume-VI) | ||
| 1. | Extracts from Policy documents and reports on Education in India-TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (Volume-VI). | 1-226 |
| VOLUME-71 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| MINORITIES CASE-(Volume-VII) | ||
| 1. | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka. (WP No.317of 1993). | 1-17 |
| 2. | Maharashtra Medical Education & Research Centre vs. State of Maharashtra (WP No. 738 of 1993). | 18-20 |
| 3. | Pragatisheel Mahila Mandal vs. State of Maharashtra (WP No 343 of 1993). | 21 |
| 4 | Anil Mohan Sood vs. State of Maharashtra | 22 |
| 5. | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka.(Table showing decisions of Impugned provisions classifieds Subject wise) | 23-73 |
| VOLUME-72 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| MINORITIES CASE-(Volume-VIII) | ||
| 1. | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka. | 1-89 |
| A. | Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 (as Amended) | |
| B. | Amendment Acts i) Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1951 [Act LXII of 1951]. ii) Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1965 [Act 19 0f 1965]. iii) Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1972 [Act 34 of 1972 iv) Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981 [Act 62 of 1981. | |
| C. | St. David College, Lampeter vs. Ministry of Education (1951) 1 All ER.559. | |
| VOLUME-73 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Memorandum and Material on Torture. | 1-41 |
| 2 | Memorandum and Material on Torture- Volume-II (Compilation of full texts of International Instruments relating to Torture). | 42-84 |
| VOLUME-74 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | T.N. Godaverman vs. Union of India (Memorial seeking to elucidate certain aspects of the Supreme Court Orders for the North Eastern State). | 1-52 |
| 2. | Manjushree Plantation Ltd. vs. The State of Tamil Nadu. | 53-55 |
| 3. | T. N. Godaverman Thirumalpad vs. Union of India. | 56-94 |
| VOLUME-75 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: State of Haryana vs. B.D.Sardana (Volume-I) & Volume-II-Compilation on Causus Omissus and Transfer of Service. | 1-113 |
| VOLUME-76 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Rajasthan State Tpt.Corp. vs. Smt. Poonam Pahwa – Submission of the Amicus Curiae, by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-32 |
| 2. | Submission-II Rajasthan State Tpt.Corp. vs. Smt. Poonam Pahwa Submission-II in Response to certain observations made by the Court during the proceeding by the Amicus Curiae, by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 33-154 |
| VOLUME-77 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Mohd. Hanududdin vs. State of Maharashtra – Note by Counsel Outlining the case in response to the direction of this court. | 1-4 |
| 2. | Opinion: Ms. D. Bagai Status of shoplifting as on offence. | 5-11 |
| 3 | Opinion: State of Punjab and CBI. | 12-32 |
| 4. | Opinion: Brigadier H.K. Dhavan testamentary Succession of joint Family Property. | 33-34 |
| 5. | Submission: State of Haryana vs. B.D.Sardana by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 35-52 |
| 6. | IA No. 10669 in suit 968 of 1993 Submission by the respondent company in response to the new case constructed by the applicant State by placing new document and new averment of facts and law in the rejoinder filed through Mr. Sanjay Karol. Advocate. | 53-123 |
| 7. | Petition: Shri Ravi Nair vs. the Editor, Observer of business & Political (to the Hon’ble Chairman of the Press Council of India. | 124-127 |
| 8. | Deo Naryan Singh vs. Commissioner of Bhaglpur (CA 4657of 1984). | 128-132 |
| 9. | Opinion: On the meaning of membership in milk coop and Madras Judgment. | 133-137 |
| 10 | Written Arguments: Dr. R.P. Panchal vs. State of Punjab (Indian System of Medicine with training of Modern Medicine and modern Surgery). | 138-142 |
| 11 | Opinion: New Bank Employers. | 143-145 |
| 12 | Opinion: in the matter of clause 4 (a) (iii) and clause 4(b) (ii) of the New Bank of India | 146-151 |
| 13 | Clarificatary Submission: TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka. | 152-154 |
| 14 | Letter to Pravin Parekh on CERS vs. UOI. (CLP (C) 13658of 1996. | 155-159 |
| 15 | Samatha vs. State of AP proposition and reference on the non- adversarial nature of Public petition and the procedure followed therein. | 160 |
| VOLUME-78 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Nagarhole Budakattu Hakku vs. State of Karnataka. | 1-5 |
| 2 | Submission: TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka with other cases Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for the Petitioners. | 6-12 |
| 3. | Draft Reply and Note on the replication for the counter Claimant in Smt. Gargi Sethi vs. Shri Gopal Singh Bhasin. | 13-15 |
| 4. | Usha Mehta vs. State of Maharashtra- Propositions. | 16-19 |
| 5. | Submission: State of Karnataka vs. Manipal Academy of Higher Education. | 20-25 |
| 6. | Submission: TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka | 26-41 |
| 7 | Godaverman vs. Union of India Suggestions by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 42-43 |
| 8. | Digambar Baloba Begade vs. State of Maharashtra- Relevant dates. | 44-47 |
| 9. | Note on the concept of ‘plain meaning’ of words. | 48-50 |
| 10 | Submission: On Manipal UGC deemed University Case. | 51-65 |
| 11 | Opinion: C. Ammini Amma vs. Civic Chandran. | 66-74 |
| 12 | The Supreme Court and Personal Law by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 75-77 |
| 13 | Draft Notice for CSE by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 78-81 |
| 14 | Aide-de-memoire- US vs. India for Member, Planning Commission. | 82-84 |
| 15 | Smt. Shiela Kaul vs. Shiv Sagar Tiwari- Compilation of Cases. | 85-183 |
| VOLUME-79 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: Sudarshan Kumar vs. Anand Prakash Written Submission and Compilation of Cases. | 1-193 |
| 2. | Compilation of Cases. | |
| 3. | Mansu vs. Shadi Ram 1996 (2) SCALE 413. | 8-10 |
| 4. | Karan Singh vs. Bhagwan Singh 1996(1) SCALE 594 and (1996) 7 SCC 768. | 11-19 |
| 5. | Amirjit Kaur vs. Pritam Singh (1975) 1 SCR 605. | 20-21 |
| 6. | Didar Singh vs. Ishar Singh 1995(1) SCALE 45. | 22-26 |
| 7. | Rikshi Ram vs. Ram Kumar (1975) 2 SCC 318. | 27-30 |
| 8. | Bhagwan Das (Dead) vs. Chet Ram 1971 (2) SCRT 640. | 31-35 |
| 9. | Krishna vs. State of Haryana (1994) 4 SCC 703. | 36-40 |
| 10 | Bhoop vs. Matadin Bhardwaj (1991) 2 SCC 128. | 41-50 |
| 11 | Lachmeshwar Prasad Shukul vs. Keshwar Lal Chaudhuri 1940 Federal Court Report 84. | 51-76 |
| 12 | Lachhman Singh vs. Pritam Chand AIR 1970 Punjab & Haryana 304. | 77-82 |
| 13 | Jabar Bhat vs. Mst. Ashmi AIR 1972 J&K 28. | 83-92 |
| 14 | Bhartu vs. Ram Sarup 1981 PLJ 204. | 93-99 |
| 15 | Mahesh Pal vs. Desh Raj AIR 1983 P&H 435. | 100-102 |
| 16 | Bhau Ram vs. B. Baijnath Singh (1962) SCR Supp. 724. | 103-147 |
| 17 | Ram Sarup vs. Munshi 1963 SCR 858. | 148-174 |
| 18 | Sant Ram vs. Labh Singh 1964 SCR 756. | 175-178 |
| 19 | Atam Prakash vs. State of Haryana (1986) 2 SCC 249. | 179-193 |
| VOLUME-80 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Corrected Submission: The Registrar, Mahe, Manipal vs. Shaji Sreedharan | 1-48 |
| 2. | Letter to Ms. Vimla Sinha on Status of the Director of CBI. | 49-52 |
| 3. | Opinion: on FCRA to Mr. Seshadri Ray. | 53-60 |
| 4. | Submission: J.K.Dewan vs. M.L.Gupta. | 61-79 |
| 5. | Opinion: Raju Ram Chander and Other of MMTC. | 80-82 |
| 6. | Submission: PILSARC vs. UOI on Injunctive stay order of 2.4.1997. | 83-104 |
| 7. | Written Submission: Sudershan Kumar vs. ANAND Prakash. | 105-110 |
| 8. | Preliminary Submission: State of Kerala vs. Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages and Prisoners by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 111-119 |
| 9. | Aide-de-memoire to Kamal Mitra Chenoy, JNU (Economic and Political weekly and contempt of the Maharashtra Legislature. | 120-124 |
| 10 | Prefatory Submission: to the Oral Submission- for joint Select Committee on the Broadcasting Bill 1997. | 125-174 |
| 11 | Submission: Naga peoples Movement of Human Rights vs. UOI. | 175-192 |
| 12 | Compilation: of materials on behalf of the NHRC (WP (CRL,) 550 of 1982). | 193-293 |
| 13 | Submission: Naga peoples Movement of Human Rights vs. UOI. Submission on behalf of the Intervenor the NHRC. | 294-309 |
| 14 | Opinion: TO Ms. Kamini Jaiswal (Re: Application in the Vohra Committee case) Dinesh Trivedi vs. UOI. | 31-314 |
| 15 | Opinion: On Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer vs. Dar. Pradeep Mittal to Sushil Kumar Jain. | 315-316 |
| 16 | Opinion: on South Asia Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union to Malvika Rajkotia. | 317-320 |
| 17 | Opinion: on Abdul Ghafffoor vs. State of Rajasthan to Sudhil Kumar Jain. | 321 |
| VOLUME-81 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Prisoner Wage (Volume-I) Indian Material. | 1-479 |
| a. Prisoner Statistics | ||
| b. Statutes, Regulation and Committees | ||
| c. Cases | ||
| d. Applicability of international convention | ||
| e. Other relevant material. | ||
| VOLUME-82 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Prisoner Wage (Volume-II) International and Foreign Material. | 1-269 |
| a. | International Instruments | |
| b. | England | |
| c. | United states. | |
| VOLUME-83 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Supreme Court Bar Association vs. Union of India and Compilation of cases. | 1-135 |
| 2. | Submission: the Trustees of Safdar Hasmi Memorial Trust vs. Government of the National Territory of Delhi. | 136-155 |
| 3. | Submission: Oil and Natural Gas Commission vs. Manoranjan Debnath. | 156-160A |
| 4. | Rejoinder- Orissa Electrical Engineers Ass. vs. State of Orissa. | 161-166 |
| 5. | Aide-de-memoire to NHRC on custodial Death of Madan Lal and filing of false evidence cases. | 167-197 |
| 6. | Opinion: to NHRC on Miss Sarika Hora No. 6139/1995-96/ NHRC. | 198-202 |
| 7. | A Note to NHRC on preliminary screening and scrutiny of complaints before the NHRC | 203-220 |
| 8. | Note to Shri H.N. Salve, Amicus (M.C.Mehta vs. UOI). | 221-224 |
| 9. | Submission: to the Director (Vigilance) on Dipa Singh Bagai. | 225-265 |
| 10 | T.M. Selvaganapathi vs. Ministry of Law Union of India. | 266-288 |
| 11 | Aide-de-memoire for an Opinion re: Mr. Pahwa. | 289 |
| 12 | State of Tamil Nadu vs. Union of India. | 290 |
| 13 | Opinion: the reply to the application on behalf of the State of Punjab. | 291-293 |
| 14 | Reply- Ajit Singh Jhanjua vs. State of Punjab. | 294-303 |
| 15 | Order- Harbhajan Singh vs. State of Punjab. | 304-307 |
| 16 | Memorandum to President on the Impending Threat to Secularism in UP. | 308-316 |
| 17 | Certain preliminary questions may to be raised before the magistrate. | 317-319 |
| 18 | Re: Orissa Tribunal case- Note. | 320 |
| 19 | Re: Central Excise- Note. | 321 |
| VOLUME-84 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: to NHRC on Goa Police Bill | 1-88 |
| 2. | Re: Param Cumaraswamy- some Note. | 89-98 |
| 3. | Re: Dr. Satnam Singh vs. Union of India (Re: Jabalpur Riot) | 99-129 |
| 4. | Draft Application- Shri Krishna Woolen Mills Ltd. vs. United Insurance Company Ltd. | 130-135 |
| 5. | Submission: on Law Special leave Petition (Civil) No. 5186 of 1997. | 136-139 |
| 6. | Compilation: Orissa Electrical Engineers Ass .vs. State of Orissa. | 140-152 |
| 7. | Re: Alok Dhir | 153-154 |
| 8. | Submission: on Judicial Salaries to first National Judicial Pay Commission Bangalore | 155-175 |
| 9. | Submission: Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Mumbai Bench) | 176-300 |
| VOLUME-85 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: T.M. Selvanganpati vs. Ministry of Law, UOI. | 1-14 |
| 2. | Aide-de-memoire to NHRC on NHRC’s Jurisdiction over Kashmir. | 15-41 |
| 3. | Submission: The Registrar, Mahe Manipal vs. Shaji Sreedharan. | 42-47 |
| 4. | Submission: Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka. | 48-80 |
| 5. | Submission: Reference on the Sanghi Cement Case. | 81-85 |
| 6. | Arunachal Pradesh. | 86-89 |
| 7. | Opinion: Wardhane vs. State of Maharashtra. | 90-96 |
| 8. | Re: Alok Dhir | 97-98 |
| 9. | Submission: Purab Mal Ram Chander vs. State of Haryana. | 99-104 |
| 10 | Opinion: Bholi vs. Rajinder RSA 97 of 1997. | 105-109 |
| 11 | Orissa Electricity- latest Judgment from the Union (Sushil Jain) | 110-111 |
| 12 | Submission: B.L. Wadhera vs. Union of India. | 112-143 |
| 13 | Draft Application- Shri Krishna Woolen Mills Ltd. vs. United Insurance Company Ltd. | 144-147 |
| 14 | Opinion: To NHRC on the extent of the jurisdiction of the NHRC. | 148-149 |
| 15 | Submission: on Nagarhole. | 150-222 |
| 16 | Opinion: to NHRC on the extent of the jurisdiction of the NHRC. | 223-224 |
| 17 | Re: Binny, letter to Mr. A. Shasidharan Advocate. | 225 |
| VOLUME-86 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka and Compilation cases. | 1-173 |
| 2. | The Management of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs. P. Veera Swamy & Ors. (Petition for special leave to Appeal). | 174-261 |
| VOLUME-87 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission Larsen and Toubro Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka. | 1-21 |
| 2. | Final Submission: State of Kerala vs. Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages and Prisoner and Anr.on Behalf of the NHRC. | 22-70 |
| 3. | Submission: Nagarhole Budakattu Hakku vs. State of Karnataka. | 71-92 |
| 4. | Submission: Of Reference on the Sanghi Cement case. | 93-97 |
| 5. | Opinion: NHRC on the extent of the jurisdiction of the National Human Rights Commission to NHRC. | 98-99 |
| 6. | Submission: Kalyan Prasad Gupta vs. State of Rajasthan. | 100-115 |
| 7. | Reply to Submissions of the State of Tamil Nadu- T.M. Selvaganapati vs. Ministry of Law, vs. Union of India. | 116-128 |
| 8. | Opinion: MP Khargone District. | 129 |
| 9. | Opinion: National Forum on Tourism and Environment vs. vs. Union of India | 130-131 |
| 10 | Submission: State of Kerala vs. Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages and Prisoner and Anr. | 132-140 |
| 11 | Opinion: Forum on Tourism vs. Union of India. | 141-164 |
| 12 | Re: Evicting the Dhobi: Some Notes to Shri Dalbir Kapur. | 165-166 |
| 13 | Re: IM Sethi SLP of 1998, Diary No. 2793/98. | 167-168 |
| 14 | Aide-de-memoire in Re: Serra- Pandit Brothers Agreement. | 169-172 |
| 15 | Re: mining in the Scheduled Areas of Chotangpur. | 173 |
| 16 | Re: Purana Chaibasa Lime Stone Quarry –A Note. | 174-181 |
| VOLUME-88 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: State of Kerala vs. Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages and Prisoner and Anr. | 1-9 |
| 2. | Aide-de-memoire to NHRC- in the matter of the request for Information Rashtriya Deepika Ltd. | 10-23 |
| 3. | Aide-de-memoire to NHRC –Bijbehra Court Martial: Access Records. | 24-35 |
| 4. | Aide-de-memoire to NHRC- Custodial Death to Mohan Lal. | 36-40 |
| 5. | Aide-de-memoire to NHRC-False Evidence before the Commission. | 41-42 |
| 6. | T.M. Selvaganapati vs. Ministry of Law- list of Materials and references submits court. | 43-48 |
| 7. | Letter to Attorny General of Sri Lanka in the Case of Dr. Jayalath Jaywardene. | 49-51 |
| 8. | Surinder Singh vs. State of Haryana- list of Authorities relied on. | 52-65 |
| 9. | A note on Nitin Kumar vs. State of Bihar LPA 876 of 1998. | 66-67 |
| 10 | Submission: Shri A.P. Jain vs. Fridabad Matel Udyog Pvt. Ltd. | 68-84 |
| 11 | Re: CSE vs. Government of Delhi. | 85-103 |
| 12 | Re: Aditya Narain vs. State of Bihar. | 104-109 |
| 13 | Letter to Shri B.D. Sharma- Report on Notified Tribes. | 110-118 |
| 14 | Re: Public Interest Petition on the Broadcasting Ordinance. | 119-120 |
| 15 | Submission: State of West Bengal vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture Assn. | 121-150 |
| VOLUME-89 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Hindustan Construction vs. Kerala Electricity. | 1-24 |
| 2. | A Legal Aide-de-memoire in Re: Cancellation of the world commission meeting on Dams in September 1998. | 25-33 |
| 3. | Aide-de-memoire in Re: Technical and Ground Staff in the Air Force. | 34-36 |
| 4. | Opinion: Re: Stormy Warrior- A horse. | 37-44 |
| 5. | Opinion: Shantiniketan (Air India) Co-operative House Society Ltd. | 45-54 |
| 6. | Synopsis and Submission CM Bahguna vs. UOI & R.C. Sahi vs. UOI. | 55-58 |
| 7. | Opinion: Shantiniketan (Air India) Co-operative House Society Ltd. | 59-69 |
| 8. | Submission: Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (Mumbai Bench) | 70-86 |
| 9. | Re: HCC vs. KSEV-List of Dates. | 87-89 |
| 10 | Note on the concept of plain meaning of words. | 90-117 |
| 11 | A note on Section 3, Environment (Protection) Act.1986. | 118-119 |
| 12 | Opinion: Re: Ram Vinay Kumar Cont. 320/1998 in SLP No. 23187of 1996. | 120-124 |
| 13 | Ram Vinay Kumar vs. CK. Basu- Affidavit-in Reply. | 125-135 |
| 14 | Re: Rosemary Colaco for Jaslene Oberoi. | 136-137 |
| 15 | Professor Upender Baxi- Re: Admissions to University College. | 138-143 |
| 16 | Re: Public Interest Petition on the Broadcasting Ordinance. | 144-148 |
| 17 | Submission: Sudershan Kumar vs. Anand Prakash. | 149-154 |
| 18 | Submission: State of Kerala vs. Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages and Prisoners | 155-163 |
| 19 | Opinion: Sikh Gurudwara, San Jose vs. India Today, Angelina Malhotra. | 164-166 |
| 20 | Proposition- Samatha vs. State of AP. | 167-170 |
| 21 | Submission: Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal ( Mumbai Bench) | 171-182 |
| 22 | Independence but not freedom by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 183-186 |
| 23 | Reference Meerut Dev. Authority vs. Satbir Singh. | 187-189 |
| 24 | Submission: Registrar, Mahe, Manipal vs. Shaji Sreedharan. | 190-203 |
| 25 | Aide-de-memoire for the NHR- re- Custodial death of Madan Lal. | 204-208 |
| 26 | Dorji of Bhutan By Rajeev Dhavan. | 209-211 |
| 27 | Submission: for Sanjay Karol (IA No.10669 in Suit 968 of 1993) | 212-219 |
| 28 | Opinion: Proposed Contract between Jean A. Bernard and Har Anand. | 220-221 |
| 29 | Opinion: re: New Bank Employees. | 222-224 |
| 30 | Report to the Central Ethical Committee on Human Research of the ICMR. | 225-231 |
| 31 | Submission: ONGC vs. Manoranjan Debnath. | 232-238 |
| 32 | M.C.Mehta vs. Union of India. | 239-241 |
| 33 | Ganga Prasad Dohre vs. State of Bihar, Further Submission. | 242-245 |
| 34 | Submission: Hari Prasad vs. Trade Authority of India. | 246-251 |
| 35 | Lambh and Botham vs. Imran Khan (India Today). | 252-258 |
| 36 | T.N. Godaverman vs. UOI- Memorial. | 259-273 |
| 37 | Opinion: on Shiv Dayal Gupta Agencies to Gujarat Milk Marketing. | 274-277 |
| 38 | A. Jeyachander Kumar, TN.-Letter. | 278-280 |
| 39 | Legal Notice to Jt. Secretary to Government of India regarding termination of service of Mr. M. Jawaharlal, Executive Assistance (Typist). | 281-283 |
| 40 | Opinion: retail tenancy in Ajmal Khan Road. | 284-289 |
| 41 | Letter to Chandita Mukerji of Comment India Foundation. | 290 |
| 42 | Submission: P.K. Dey vs. State of U.P. | 291-296 |
| 43 | Opinion: TO Vijay Gupta- re: B-2 Friends Colony. | 297 |
| VOLUME-90 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Dr. Prabha Manchanda vs. I. Samira Kohli and Madhu Kishwar. | 1-18 |
| 2. | Submission: State of West Bengal vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture Assn. | 19-59 |
| 3. | Submission: for the Peoples Commissions on Patents Chair Justice V.R.Krishna Iyer with annexures. | 60-192 |
| 4. | Settling Shree Krishna Woolen Mills Ltd. vs. United Insurance Company Ltd. | 193-196 |
| 5. | Opinion: Constitutional Obligation and Treaty Obligation: TRIPS, the Uruguay Round of GATT and Pipeline protection. | 197-201 |
| 6. | Opinion: To protest a natural lake studded area near Vasant Vihar. | 202 |
| VOLUME-91 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | An Aide-de-memoire for NHRC on the Goa Prison case by Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-69 |
| 2. | Prison for the Twenty First Century: Doubts about the Prison Bill 1998 by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 70-170 |
| 3. | Submission: for the Peoples Commissions on Patents Chair Justice V.R.Krishna Iyer | 171-214 |
| 4. | Treaties and People Indian Reflection by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 215-303 |
| 5. | Submission: State of West Bengal vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture Assn. | 304-322 |
| 6. | Only the good news on the Law of the Press in India by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 323-344 |
| VOLUME-92 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| Materials Submitted to Court in Lottery matter-NCT of Delhi vs. State of Nagaland and UOI vs. SM Agency: Compilation Volume-I | ||
| 1. | Note by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | A-B |
| 2. | 1964 (5) SCR 975 Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. vs. The State of Assam. | 1-55 |
| 3. | 1979(2)SCR 409 Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. vs. State of U.P. | 56-101 |
| 4. | 1997(7) SCC 251 Pawan Alloy & Casting (P) Ltd. vs. U.P. State Electricity Board. | 102-147 |
| 5. | 1967 (2) SCR 361 State of Mysore vs. H. Sanjeeviah. | 148-162 |
| 6. | 1968(3) SCR 829 State of Madras vs. N.K .Natrjan Mudaliar. | 163-190 |
| 7. | 1986 (2) SCC 479 Associated Tanners, Vizianagarm, A.P. vs. Commercial Tax Officer | 191-197 |
| 8. | 1990 ALL England Law Report. | 198-227 |
| 9. | 1957 SCR. 930 RMD Chamarbaugwalla vs. Union of India | 28-250 |
| 10 | 1980(1) SCR1036 Col. A.S. Iyer vs. Balasubramanyam. | 251-285 |
| 11 | 1978 A.P.Law Journal 492 BS.Padmavathamma vs. A.P.S.R.T.C. | 286-305 |
| 12 | Gujarat University vs. Sri Krishna (1963) Supp. 1 SCR 112. | 306-366 |
| VOLUME-93 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| NCT of Delhi vs. State of Nagaland- Compilation of Cases and Material- Volume-II. | ||
| 1. | Gherumal vs. Mahadeodas (1959) Supp.2 SCR 406. | 1-42 |
| 2. | Fateh Chand vs. State of Maharashtra (1077) 2 SCR 828. | 43-76 |
| 3. | Sesha Ayyar vs. Krishna Ayyar AIR 1936 Mad. 225. | 77-98 |
| 4. | Extract from P.V .Kane: History of the Dharamsamtra (Poona, Bhandarkar Institute,1946) III,538-542 | 99-103 |
| 5. | Extract on ‘Lotteries’ from Enclopedia Britannica (1980) Edn.) p.327-8. | 104-106 |
| 6. | Ronald J. Rychlak “Lotteries Revenues and Social Costs.” (1992)34 Boston College Law Review 11. | 107-177 |
| 7. | Automobile Transport vs. State of Rajasthan (1962) 1SCR 491. | 178-334 |
| 8. | Extract from W.A .Wynes : Legislative, Executive and Judicial Powers in Australia (Sydney, Law Book Co. 1970) pp 258-259 | 335-337 |
| VOLUME-94 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| Materials Submitted to Court Cinema Matter- Compilation | ||
| 1. | Indian Express News Papers vs. UOI (1985) 1 SCC 641. | 1-71 |
| 2. | K.N. Abas vs. UOI (1970) 2SCC 780. | 72-89 |
| 3. | Indian Express News Paper (P) Ltd. vs. UOI (1986)1SCC 133. | 90-222 |
| 4. | S.M. Kala vs. University of Rajasthan (1986) Supp. SCC.677. | 223-224 |
| 5. | Odyssey Communication vs. Lokvidayan Sanghatana (1988) 3 SCC410. | 225-230 |
| 6. | S. Ranarajan vs. P. Jagjivan Ram (1989)2 SCC574. | 231-256 |
| 7. | Life Insurance Corp. Ltd. vs. Prof. Manubhai D. Shah (1992) 3 SCC 637. | 257-285 |
| 8. | Printer (Mysore) Ltd. vs./ Asst. Com. Tax Officer (1994) 2 SCC 434. | 286-297 |
| 9. | Gajanan Visheshwar Birijur vs. UOI (1994) 5 SCC 550. | 298-305 |
| 10 | Dr. Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo vs. P. Kashinath Kunte (1996) 1 SCC130. | 306-344 |
| 11 | People’s Union for civil Liberties (PUCL) vs. UOI (1997) 1 SCC 301. | 345-362 |
| VOLUME-95 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Miami Herald Publising Company vs. Pat L. Tornillo (1974) 418 US 241,241 Edn.(2d)730,94 S Ct. 2831 (Right to reply) | 1-15 |
| 2. | Neal R. Wooley vs. George Maynard (1997)430 US 705, 51 L ED 2d 752, 97 S Ct 1428. | 16-32 |
| 3. | D. Louis Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education (1977) 431 US209, 52 L Ed. 2d 261,97 Ct. 1782. | 33-76 |
| 4. | Randolph vs. National Federation of the Blind of North Carolina (1988) 487,101 L Ed. 2d 669,108s Ct. 2667. | 77-110 |
| 5. | John J. Hurley vs. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) 515 US,132 L Ed. 2D 487,115 S Ct.2338. | 111-132A |
| 6. | Turner Broadcasting System vs. Federal Communication Commission (1994)512 US 129 L Ed 2d 497 S Ct. 2445. | 133-175 |
| 7. | Glickman Secretary of Agriculture vs. Wileman Brothers (1997) | 176-202 |
| 8. | Note on Turner-II (From Internet) | 203-204. |
| 9. | Turner –II Turner Broadcasting System vs. Federal Communication Commission (1997 95-992). | 205-240 |
| VOLUME-96 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: on behalf of Eastern Indian Motion Picture Association by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. (St. of WB vs. Eastern Indian Motion). | 1-20 |
| 2. | Only the good News- on the Law of Press in India by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 12-42 |
| 3. | Submission: State of West Bengal vs. Eastern Motion Picture – Submission on striking down Section 5(3) of the West Bengal Act. | 43-44 |
| 4. | Final Submission: State of West Bengal vs. Eastern Motion Picture by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 45-72 |
| 5. | Final Submission NCT of Delhi vs. State of Nagaland SLP15296 of 1998 by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan.—the gazette of India, The Lotteries (Regulation) Act 1998. | 73-109 |
| 6. | An Aide-de-memoire: by the Amicus Curiae Dr. Rajeev Dhavan .in the matter of Noida Enterprises Assn. vs. Noida. | 11-116 |
| 7. | An Aide-de-memoire Tribal Rights in Sanctuaries and Parks. | 117-120 |
| 8. | Re: Right to Agriculture From Dr. Rajeev Dhavan TO Mr. B.K. Keyala. | 121 |
| 9. | Opinion: on Diesel and the Delhi Pollution Committee by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 122-185 |
| 10 | NCT of Delhi vs. State of Nagaland- Note on the Compilation of cases by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 186-187 |
| 11 | Quick off the-cuff response to the papers on Diesel sent by Anil Agarwal. | 188 |
| 12 | Punjab Communication vs. UOI – Reference by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 189 |
| VOLUME-97 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Union of India – CW Petition No.4567/97 Compilation Cases. | 1-273 |
| VOLUME-98 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Ansal in the matter of the payment of External Development Charges (EDC) by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-12 |
| 2. | Submission: Smt Neelam vs. Raja Ram by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 13-20 |
| 3. | Opinion: part Time Members of the Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corpn. On India. | 21-24 |
| 4. | Opinion: On Karnataka School Fees case Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 25-32 |
| 5. | Opinion and Draft: notice under the FCRS 1999 to Indian Social Institute by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 33-37 |
| 6. | Submission: Ajit Singh vs. State of Punjab CA 3792-94 of 1989. | 38-44 |
| 7. | Shri Mahaveer Singh and Manju – an Aide-de-memoire for NHRC by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 45-64 |
| 8. | Inder P. Choudhries and Polygraph tests- An Aide-de-memoire by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 65-81 |
| 9. | Submission: Ansal Properties & Industries Ltd. vs. DCM Ltd. | 82-99 |
| 10 | Submission: Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Union of India – Submission by way of rejoinder by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 100-109 |
| 11 | East India Hotels Ltd. vs. .Klause Mittelbachert out line of Submission on behalf of the appellant by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 110-118 |
| 12 | Re: Reply in the Jayalalitha case | 119-120 |
| 13 | Submission: Union of India vs. Anil Kumar by Union of India | 121-129 |
| 14 | In the matter of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Shri R.R. Singh by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 130-141 |
| 15 | Submission: J. Jayalalitha vs. Union of India by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 142-151 |
| 16 | A note on Proposed Article 32 petition on the communal tension in Gujarat by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 152-154 |
| 17 | Opinion: why the motion Picture Theatres case was wrongly decide? By Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 155-167 |
| 18 | Preliminary Opinion on the New to review the Movies Censorship Case by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 168-170 |
| 19 | Employment Insurance Scheme opinion sought by B.D .Sharma. | 171-189 |
| 20 | Opinion: in the respect of certain aspects of the Forest matter. | 190-193 |
| 21 | Opinion: V.P. Chaudhary vs. UOI Reference by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 194-195 |
| 22 | Punjab Communication vs. UOI Reference by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 196 |
| 23 | Human Rights- A Compilation of International Instruments United Nations New Yorl, 1988. | 197-208 |
| 24 | Opinion: on Displacement Policy to Tony Herbert, Bihar by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 209-212 |
| 25 | Opinion: on Compensation to Victims of Communal Violence in Ajmer. | 213-226 |
| 26 | Settling Counter Affidavit in KP Phillipose vs. State of Kerala. | 227-247 |
| 27 | Opinion/Submission on behalf of the State of TN by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 248-251 |
| 28 | Opinion: on review in Lotteries matter. | 252-256 |
| 29 | Opinion: to Anne Marchal- Re: Divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.195 by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 257-261 |
| 30 | Opinion: On Arbitration. | 262-263 |
| 31 | Re: Garden Area in Pune. | 264-265 |
| 32 | Opinion: State of Sikkim vs. Bina D. Sharma- Roster system. | 266-272 |
| 33 | Letter to Mr. M.K .Damodaran, Advocate General, Kerala on Cauvery- Cross Examination of Prof. Ramaprasad. | 273-274 |
| 34 | Opinion: in respect of notice by Ansal to Delhi Vidyut Board. | 275-277 |
| 35 | Re: Chiman Naryan Tara vs. State of Maharashtra- Advice. | 278-280 |
| VOLUME-99 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Brij Raj Meena vs. State of UP. Aide-de-memoire to NHRC. | 1-16 |
| 2. | Opinion: Sky Consolidates vs. State of Bihar by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 17-27 |
| 3. | Ram Kanwar, Santo, Kamlesh and NHRC- Aide-de-memoire by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 28-39 |
| 4. | Submission: Consumer Education Research Society vs. UOI by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 40-78 |
| 5. | Opinion: E.K. Nayanar vs. Malayam Manorma. | 79 |
| 6. | Administrative Law by Sir William Wade. | 80-86 |
| 7. | Aide-de-memoire in Ram Kanwar, Santo, Kamlesh and NHRC by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 87-99 |
| 8. | Dr. Ram Ashray Yadav- Former Chairman BPSC- Spl .Ref. No. 1 of 1997 to Shri Soli Sorabji by. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 100-186 |
| VOLUME-100 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Raju S. Jethamalini V. state of Maharashtra-Preliminary Submission of Petition- Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-34 |
| 2. | Aide-de-memoire on State of Kerala vs. Xavier Paul by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan to NHRC. | 35-49 |
| 3. | The Civil Service and The RSS: A Note. | 50-64 |
| 4. | Final Submission: Western Press P. Ltd. vs. Custodian. | 65-100 |
| 5. | Opinion: on K.N. Paniker on legal notice of 30 April 1999. | 101-106 |
| 6. | Aide-de-memoire on TADA. | 107-111 |
| 7. | Oral Opinion: B.L. Kapur Hospital Relationship with Ludhiana. | 112 |
| 8. | Submission: of Reference on the Sanghi Cement. | 113-115 |
| 9. | Bio-Diversity. | 116-120 |
| 10 | Draft Bill of 31.03.200- Model Law Comments- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 121-133 |
| 11 | Re: Electricity Bill 2000. | 134-135 |
| 12 | Settling Gawli Affidavit in the Protection matter. | 136-139 |
| 13 | Summary Opinion: Institute of Social Welfare vs. State of Kerala. | 140 |
| 14 | Reporting on Court. | 141-143 |
| 15 | Re: Haryana Distilleries. | 144-146 |
| 16 | Further Opinion: on the Kerala Election Case: Settling the SLP. | 147-151 |
| 17 | Opinion Tribunals :Composition and Due Process (1996) | 152-175 |
| 18 | Submission: United Bank of India vs. Abhijit Tea Company. | 176-191 |
| 19 | Final Submission: Western Press vs. Custodian. | 192-227 |
| 20 | B.L. Kapur Hospital: Proposed agreement. | 228-232 |
| 21 | Query, Opinion: Continuance of a Temporary Appointment at. JNU. | 233-241 |
| 22 | Re: Malvika Rajkotia Hindu Succession Act. | 242 |
| 23 | Aide-de-memoire: on the case of Dhamlal D. Krishna vs. on Service. | 243 |
| VOLUME-101 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: In the SCI ,SLP No. 1490 of 1999 and connected SLP in the matter of the Gujarat Agriculture University vs. Rathod Labhu Beachar- Written Submission- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-25 |
| 2. | Letter to M.K. Damodaran, Kerala House in Re-Draft letter in the matter of the Mullaperiyar. | 26-28 |
| 3. | Re Shri Mahaveer Singh and in the matter of Manju- Aide-de-memoire by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan- Sep. 1999. | 29-48 |
| 4. | Preliminary Opinion: on Smt. Ravinder Kaur vs. Supdt. Kanpur Jail to Chairman of NHRC by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 49-54 |
| 5. | Aide-de-memoire: on the Right to Consenting AIDS/HIV Victims to marry to Chairman, NHRC with covering letter. | 55-61 |
| 6. | Aide-de-memoire on the in corporitisation of the Asia Pacific forum of National Human Rights Intuition under Australian Law to Chairman NHRC by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 62-81 |
| 7. | Preliminary Note to Bartley C. Zuber, Chicago, Illinols in re: Shamlal D. Krishnani et. AI vs. Alexander and Alexander. | 82-87 |
| 8. | Suo Motu Notice on Insurance Cover for HIV Victims No. 2837/30/199-200- Preliminary Notes for the NHRC- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 88-100 |
| 9. | Letter dt. 14.02.200 to Chairman, NHRC Re meeting on Denitrified Criminal Tribes on 15 Feb. 2000. | 101-104 |
| 10 | Aide-de-memoire: on the Jurisdiction of the NHRC when the High Court Supreme Court is Seized of a matter to Chairman NHRC dt. on 01.11.2000. | 105-112 |
| 11 | Aide-de-memoire: to Chairman, NHRC re; Jurisdiction of the Commission in the matters that are before some other commission, and in the matter of Parminder Singh by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 113-122 |
| 12 | Preliminary Submission in the SCI Civil Appellate Jurisdiction CA 2770/2000 under Section 10 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to transaction in Securities) Act.1992. | 123-130 |
| 13 | Propositions the extent of Judicial review in respect of the Contractual relation of the State. | 131-132 |
| 14 | Opinion: Western Press vs. Custodian by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 133-143 |
| 15 | Letter dt. 12.07.2000 to Param Cumaraswamy re: Criticism of the Judiciary. | 144-148 |
| 16 | Seniority and Promotion Rules in Hindustan Zinc-A comment for Shri Ashok Rao, President NCOA. | 149-160 |
| 17 | Opinion: to Navin Prakash on Bihar Public Service Commission. | 161-171 |
| 18 | Opinion: in the matter of the agreement between Kerala and Tamil Nadu in the matter or the use of eaters of the Periyar River A Preliminary Aide-de-memoire by way of advice. | 172-181 |
| 19 | Submission: in the matter of D.B. Soghani and Other vs. all India Bank of Rajasthan Employee Association. | 182-188 |
| 20 | Re: Goa Sea Foods Condo nation of Delay in filing a special leave Petition (SLP) in a batch Matter where ‘leave’ has been granted but where the querist did not file and SLP because of the basis of bonafide but erroneous legal advice. | 189-194 |
| 21 | Submission in the matter of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan vs. Veena Verma. | 195-200 |
| 22 | Interpretation of Contracts. | 201-208 |
| 23 | Opinion: UP Electricity Board Case. | 209-210 |
| VOLUME-102 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Before the learned Arbitrator Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.K. Bahri (Retd). In the matter of Arbitration case No. 99 of 1998 and in the matter of Jyoti Pvt. Ltd. vs. EIH Ltd. and in the matter of counter claims EIH ltd. vs. Jyoti Pvt. Ltd. written Submission and Compilation of Related Documents | 1-179 |
| VOLUME-103 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: In the matter of Rajasthan vs. Rambagh Golf Club and Ors. Connected cases. Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. On the Behalf of the Respondents. | 1-16 |
| 2. | A note on the case- law (malafide)- Nature of Pleadings | 17-24 |
| 3. | Submission: in the matter of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal vs. State of Karnataka Submission- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 25-30 |
| 4. | Submission: in the matter of Sudershan Kumar vs. Anand Prakash Submission: on the behalf of petitioner by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 31-36 |
| 5. | Preliminary Note to Bartley C. Zuber, Chicago, re: Shamlal D. Krishnani et. AI vs. Alexander and Alexander. | 37-41 |
| 6. | For NHRC- Counter Affidavit-RE: State of Kerala vs. S. Nambinarayan OP15272/2001 | 42-48 |
| 7. | Preliminary Submission: in the matter of State of Sikkim vs. Ms. Bina Sharma | 49-53 |
| 8. | Preliminary Written Submission on behalf of the Petitioners in the Matter of Suryakant Gupta vs. Rajasthan Corn Products ltd. | 54-65 |
| 9. | Submission: in Rejoinder by the petitioner- in the Matter of Suryakant Gupta vs. Rajasthan Corn Products ltd. | 66-72 |
| 10 | Comdr. Sureshwar D. Sinha vs. Union of India Aide-de-memoire by Amicus Curiae. | 73-77 |
| 11 | Shamlal D. Krishnani vs. AON Risk Service, INC, US Declaration of Dr. Dhavan. | 78-94 |
| 12 | Opinion: FCRA, 1976Querist-VANI Voluntary Action Network India –. | 59-98 |
| 13 | Written Submission: in the matter of Chandra Ballabh vs. Delhi Development Authority and Another Written Submission: on behalf of the second respondent by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 99-114 |
| 14 | In the matter of Public Interest Litigation No. 556 of 2001 Registrar High Court vs. State of Uttaranchal. | 115-118 |
| 15 | Re: R.S. Bhati- Dismissal Case. | 119-121 |
| 16 | For Markand Adkar- Re: Sale of Property by the Shri Panjarapol Sanshta, Jalgaon- draft of the Synopsis. | 122 |
| 17 | Chander Prakash Tiwari vs. Shakuntala Shukla Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan on behalf of petitioner. | 123-137 |
| 18 | Opinion and Advice on settling of the SLP- Public trust, the Charity Commission and the High A Court. | 138-139 |
| 19 | Inder Singh Godara vs. State of Haryana. | 140-144 |
| 20 | Union of India vs. Shatabadi Trading and Investment P Ltd. with list of dates. | 145-154 |
| 21 | Opinion: on making Managing Director, Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing Corporation-CA655 and 656 of 2001. | 155-157 |
| 22 | Benami petition on behalf of Deputationists. | 158-177 |
| 23 | Opinion: Kerala State Beverages vs. Kondu Salin and Others. | 178-179 |
| 24 | In the matter of Vico Vajradanti. | 180-181 |
| 25 | Opinion: Re- State Bank of India (B.K. Abndrews). | 182-183 |
| 26 | Note on the Government of Rajasthan’s Environment Impact Assessment Report- Final Interim. | 184 |
| 27 | Re: Mansi Wakal Project. | 185-187 |
| 28 | Note on the Samatha vs. State of AP (1997) 8 SCC 191. | 188-192 |
| 29 | On the Mansi Wakal Project. Supply water to Udaipur. | 193-203 |
| 30 | Smt. Mili Chatterji vs. Kanwaljit Singh, Criminal Contempt Application No. 7 of 2001. | 204-226 |
| 31 | Criminal Legal Aid. | 227-229 |
| 32 | Hemant Dhasmana vs. CBI, ACU-II New Delhi Written Submission on behalf of petitioner. | 230-240 |
| 33 | Point to be Considered in the SYP Canal Matter. | 241-242 |
| 34 | State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab –Propositions in Law. | 243-246 |
| 35 | State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab-original Suit No. 6 of 1996- Propositions of Law. | 247-259 |
| 36 | Note on the stance of the Union. | 260 |
| 37 | Re: Inter-State Water Disputes Bill 2001. | 261-265 |
| 38 | Smt. Mili Chatterji vs. Kanwaljit Singh (in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital Criminal Contempt Application No. 7 of 2001. | 266-273 |
| 39 | Anando Jyoti Chatterjee vs. The State of Uttaranchal & Five others (in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital- Civil Misc, Writ Petition No. 21 of 2001). | 274-288 |
| 40 | A note on the case- law (Malafide- Nature of pleading). | 289-306 |
| VOLUME-104 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: on the behalf of the State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab ( Punjab Haryana Canal case) Supreme Court of India Original Jurisdiction Suit No. 6 of 1996) Contents, | 1-83 |
| 2. | Written Submission: on the behalf of the State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab ( Punjab Haryana Canal case) Supreme Court of India Original Jurisdiction Suit No. 6 of 1996)-proposition of law in support of the Arguments by Defendant No.1 | 84-96 |
| 3. | List of event showing existence of water dispute between Punjab & Haryana- in the matter Ravi – Beas Water. | 97-114 |
| 4. | Note on the stance of the Union. | 115-116 |
| 5. | State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab (Compilation of Documents –Volume-I). | 117-162 |
| 6. | State of Haryana vs. State of Punjab (Compilation of Documents for Suit No. 6 of 1996). | 136-294 |
| 7. | Govt. of India- Narmada water Disputes Tribunal- Further Report of the Narmada water Dispute Tribunal under Section 5(3) of Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956. | 295-301 |
| VOLUME-105 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: In the matter of the Custodial Death of Bachniya, Son of Laknia Opinion for the NHRC. | 1-18 |
| 2. | Opinion: in the matter of Sate vs. Lalit Kumar Yadav-NHRC N0. 1061/4/200-2001 Opinion for the NHRC. | 19-27 |
| 3. | Opinion: Sanghi Industries to Anil Satchthey, Advocate. | 28-45 |
| 4. | Submission: Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research vs. State of Maharashtra and others. | 46-58 |
| 5. | Opinion: Inter State Water Dispute Bill 2001 | 59-64 |
| 6. | Preliminary Ade-de-Memoire- Research on the Human Genome Genetic Research and Services- Preliminary Aide-de-Memoire-on legal Questions to Dr. Manju Sharma, Secretary, Govt. of India. | 65-76 |
| 7. | Letter dt. 27.10.2001 to Dr. Manju Sharma Secretary Govt. of India regarding Dr. Panicker’s Proposal on Embryonic stem. Cells. | 77-79 |
| 8. | Opinion: Electoral Disqualifications of School Teacher. | 80-82 |
| 9. | Submission: M.G. Badappanavar vs. State of Karnataka. | 83-85 |
| 10 | Synopsis- Appeal raises important questions of Law and equity arising out of the implementation of the remand of case in the Supreme Court Judgment in Shyam Nandan Prasad vs. State of Bihar. | 86-87 |
| 11 | Censorship of Jha’s Book Preliminary Objection. | 88-93 |
| 12 | Opinion/Note: on Rathong Chu Hydel Project. | 94-105 |
| 13 | State of Bank India Stamp Duty on Mortgage by Title Deeds- Opinion by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 106-118 |
| 14 | Before the National Commission for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribals- Proceedings/findings order sheet. Sh. Manuram Baghel Village Nagarnar & Ors. Vs. 1 Chief Secretary Chhattisgarh, 2 CMD, NDMC, 3 Collector, Bastar. | 119-147 |
| 15 | Compilation :Hiranar Steel Plant in Bastar Case | 148-150 |
| 16 | Proposition on Casteism, Racism and need for Effective Action. | 151-154 |
| 17 | Article ‘India’s Apsrtheid” published in Hindu dt. 24.08.01. | 155-158 |
| 18 | Article “Jatibad Nasalvad or sanukat Rashter” Published in Hindustan Times dt. 19.8.2001. | 159-162 |
| 19 | Letter dt. 18.8.2001 to Chairman, NHRC regarding NHRC on Casteism proposition. | 163-166 |
| 20 | Letter dt. 24.8.2001 to Chairman, NHRC regarding India’s Apartheid with annexure. | 167-172 |
| VOLUME-106 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: on Reliance by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-29 |
| 2. | Re: State Bank of India – Stamp Duty on Mortage by title Deeds by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 30-55 |
| 3. | Letter dt. 03.01.2002 to Prof. Hans Dembowski-re: Contempt of Court. | 56-57 |
| 4. | Submission: M/s Hindustan Argo Chemicals Ltd. vs. Union of India for Respondent No.3 | 58-64 |
| 5. | Statement and Ade-de-Memoire-by the Amicus Curiae- in the matter of NOIDA Entrepreneurs Association vs. Noida. | 65-95 |
| 6. | Opinion: on the review in the Haryana vs. Punjab Suit No. 6 of 1996. | 96-135 |
| 7. | Submission: Universal Cylinder vs. Indian Oil Corp. | 136-138 |
| 8. | Note | 139 |
| 9. | Opinion: on Nagarnar. | 140-143 |
| 10 | Submission: State of Punjab vs. M/S Dewan Modern Breweries Ltd. | 144-147 |
| 11 | Aide-de-Memoire- the J&K Bank Debt. Case | 148-158 |
| 12 | Opinion: In re: the Syrian Embassy. | 159-169 |
| 13 | Submission: Cylinder vs. Indian Oil Corp. | 170 |
| 14 | Opinion: Re: JDT Islam Orphanage. | 171-177 |
| 15 | Opinion: on the joint session of Parliament for the purposes of enacting POTO. | 178-180 |
| 16 | Opinion: on the Attorney General of India have an independent status (a) Court and (b) as an Independent Constitutional authority | 181-182 |
| 17 | Opinion: on the case of Ms. Harinder Kaur Sethi now Sawhney –a teacher of Lady Irwin College. | 183-187 |
| 18 | Write Petition- Entrepreneurs Association vs. Noida. | 188-218 |
| 19 | Submission: Madras MBA CASE – (Jeppier Educational Institute) | 219-223 |
| VOLUME-107 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Association Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Union of India (CWP NO. 4567 of 1999) (Volume RD-6A). | 1-83 |
| 2. | Association Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Union of India (CWP NO. 4567 of 1999) (Volume RD-6B). | 84-203 |
| 3. | Association Victims of Uphaar Tragedy vs. Union of India (CWP NO. 4567 of 1999) (Volume RD-6C). | 204-240 |
| VOLUME-108 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission and Compilation Cases-FF Engineering Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. vs. Cables- Suit 790/2002 | 1-168 |
| VOLUME-109 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: to NHRC on the Complaint of P.D. Mathew and related matters. | 1-47 |
| 2. | Opinion: to Center for Philosophy and Foundation of Science Agreement with the Discovery Channel | 48-56 |
| 3. | Tentative Opinion: on Mangalore Port Trust Workers. | 57-65 |
| 4. | Opinion: agreement Intach and Aus Heritage M.S Nalini Thakur. | 66-71 |
| 5. | Letter dt. 01.05.2002 to Professor Hans Dembowski –Contempt of Court. | 72-74 |
| 6. | FF Engineering Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. vs. LG Cables- Suit 790/2002 Submission: on behalf of Defendant No. 1 Plus Compilation No-II. | 75-124 |
| 7. | Notes on Orissa and Privatization. | 125-127 |
| 8. | Note on Article 355- State of Rajasthan vs. UOI. | 128-138 |
| 9. | FF Engineering Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. vs. LG Cables- Suit 790/2002 Part-II of Submission of Defendants Suit 790/2002. | 139-191 |
| VOLUME-110 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: FF Engineering Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. vs. LG Cables | 1-38 |
| 2. | Written Submission: by petitioner in the matter of Jeeva Educational Trust Lashmi Kanthammal Educational TrustW.P.No.14146-48 and 14152 of 2002 and related matters. | 39-64 |
| 3. | Opinion: on the Periyar Lease Deed for the State of Kerala. | 65-83 |
| 4. | Opinion: on the M/s Bengal EMTS Cola Mines Ltd. | 84-106 |
| 5. | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka Tables Showing decision on impugned provision classified subject-wise (Write Petition No. 317 of 1993) | 129-172 |
| 6 | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (Write Petition No. 317 of 1993) Documents to show that the Question relied upon by Kasliwal J. was in the debate on the draft Article 22 and not the Draft Article 32. | 173-182 |
| VOLUME-111-A | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: to the Election Commission on the Election in Gujarat on behalf of SHAMAT by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-22 |
| 2. | Submission: in the Supreme Court of India Special Reference 1 of 2002. Submission on behalf of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 23-48 |
| 3. | In the Supreme Court of India Special Reference 1 of 2002 propositions by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for State of West Bengal, Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 49-72 |
| 4. | In the Supreme Court of India Special Reference 1 of 2002 materials State of West Bengal, Communist Party of India (Marxist) Materials and cases. | 73-164 |
| 5. | In the Supreme Court of India Special Reference 1 of 2002 Out line OF Arguments in Supreme Court (to be read with Written Submission and Materials) by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for State of West Bengal, Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 165-181 |
| 6. | In the SCI –Civil Original Jurisdiction- Special Reference No. -1 of 2002 by Intervenors (The Trustees of Safdar Hasmi Memorial Trust Sahamat). | 182-184 |
| 7. | Submission: to the Election Commission on the Election in Gujarat on Behalf of Sahamat. | 185-208 |
| VOLUME-111-B | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Before the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal in the matter of Water Dispute Regarding the interstate river cauvery- Note- 1 on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 1-40 |
| 2. | Before the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal in the matter of Water Dispute Regarding the interstate river cauvery (Note on implications of Kerala not being a party, the State reorganization Act, 1956 and of Kerala’s Protest and Conduct since 1956)-Note 2 on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 14-82 |
| 3. | Before the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal in the matter of Water Dispute Regarding the interstate river cauvery( note on the Jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Tribunal to interpret enforce the treaties of 1892 and 1924 or treat them as the basis of adjusting equities amongst the co-riparian state) – Note 3 on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 83-97 |
| 4. | Before the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal in the matter of Water Dispute Regarding the interstate river cauvery (Note on the legality of the Agreement)- Note-4 on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 98-115 |
| 5. | Before the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal in the matter of Water Dispute Regarding the interstate river cauvery (interpretation) – Note -5 on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 116-129 |
| 6. | Re: Gujarat Note. | 130-131 |
| 7 | Re: Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited Cancellation of Allotments. | 132-142 |
| 8. | Submission: to the Election Commission on the Election in Gujarat on Behalf of Sahamat by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 143-164 |
| 9. | Preliminary Submission: on behalf of the State of Sikkim (State of Sikkim vs. Ms. Bina D. Sharma) SLP No. 361/2000. | 165-170 |
| 10 | Written Submission: (S.K. Chaudhry vs. Delhi Power Supply Comp. Ltd.). | 171-174 |
| 11 | Submission: to the Election Commission on the Election in Gujarat on Behalf of Sahamat by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 175-199 |
| 12 | Note for Mr. Parasaran on religious endowments. | 200-201 |
| VOLUME-112 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Final Written Submission in reply and in response to the Issue framed by the Court- in the Matter of TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka WP 317 OF 1993. | 1-30 |
| 2. | Final Written Submission in reply and in response to the Issue framed by the Court- in the Matter of TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka WP 317 OF 1993. | 31-59 |
| 3. | Maharashtra Institute of Technology vs. State of Maharashtra | 60-75 |
| 4. | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka (Tables showing decisions on impugned provision classified Subject-wise) | 76-97 |
| 5. | TMA Pai Foundation vs. State of Karnataka. (Documents to show that the Question relied upon by Kasliwal J. was in the debate on the Draft Article 22 and not the Draft Article 23) | 98-349 |
| VOLUME-113 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: (Re: State Bank of India Staff Association) | 1-7 |
| 2. | Opinion: (In Re: Railways Board Sleeper sets) | 8-17 |
| 3. | In the Supreme Court of India SLP No. 361/2000 in the matter of Sikkim vs. Bina D. Sharma. | 18-23 |
| 4. | Opinion: SC’S clarification of 11 November 2002 in the article 16(4A) BATCH OF CASE (Re: Mallikarjuna Sramy vs. Union of India WP 255/2002). | 24-31 |
| 5. | Exemplary Damage under Public and Private law (Nilabati Behara vs. State of Orissa 1993 (2) SCC 746). | 32-36 |
| 6. | For Ravi Rebbapragada (Ade-de-Memoire on Hussain Sagar) | 37-39 |
| 7. | Opinion: Re: Rembursment of Travel Expenses). | 40-44 |
| 8. | Re: Jamia Opinion as draft Letter. | 45-47 |
| 9. | Mining in Mallana (Rough) Draft for Discussion) | 48-51 |
| 10 | Before the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal Kerala Note 6, rejoinder on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 52-74 |
| 11 | On shifting of Delhi High Courts (Draft of the Approach). | 75-77 |
| 12 | In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi (CPWN of 1997) in the matter of Association of Victims of Uphaar vs. Union of India and Others. | 78-102 |
| 13 | Submission: by way of reply to DVB on facts and liability | 103-136 |
| 14 | Submission: on legal Propositions Advanced by the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) and Other Respondents | 137-152 |
| 15 | Submission: on issue of fact and compliance (Submission: in reply continued (Vol.RD.-7B). | 153-169 |
| 16 | In the High Court of Delhi (CWP No. 4567/1997) in Association of Victims of Uphaar vs. UOI. And Others. | 170-200 |
| VOLUME-114 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | National Consumer Dispute redress’s Commission-OP No. 379/2002 in the matter of Smt. Babita Aggarwal vs. Dr. S.K. Goel Submission of Amircus Curiae Rajeev Dhavan | 1-18 |
| 2. | Opinion: Re: Mysore sale International Ltd. | 19-45 |
| 3. | Submission: Binny ltd. and Other vs. v sadasivam and Ors. (SLP (CIVIL) No.898 of 1997, CA No.1976 of 1998) | 46-62 |
| 4. | State New Delhi vs. Navjot Sandhu (SLP (Crl.) 577-80 of 2003) – Written Submission for the Respondent No.2 | 63-73 |
| 5. | N.D. Jayal vs. Union of India (WP 296 of 1992) Submission for petitioner and Supporting Interveners. (Tehri Cases Submission with List of Dates) | 74-93 |
| 6. | N.D .Jayal vs. Union of India (WP 295 of 1992) List of Dates. | 94-105 |
| 7. | M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (WP (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985) Written Submission | 106-120 |
| 8. | M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (WP (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985) Written Submission on the behalf of Jai Krishna Impex Pvt. Ltd. | 121-132 |
| 9. | Jaiswal Steel Enterprise vs. Deptt. Of Telecommunication (CA3983 of 2000) List of Dates. | 133-142 |
| 10 | CMP 1/2003- Preliminary Submission on behalf of the State of Kerala. | 143-150 |
| 11 | State of J&K vs. Amjad Pervisz Mirza (CA 39-41 of 2001) | 151-162 |
| 12 | Opinion: for B.D. Sharma (Task Force Report). | 163-165 |
| 13 | Aide-de-memoire: on Disinvestment (Shri Raj Kumar Gupta and Mr. Rao from Hyderabad). | 166-168 |
| 14 | Commissioner of Customs, Calcutta vs. M/s Grand Prime Ltd. CA. 4151- 7 OF 2002- List of Dates and Submission by Respondent No.1 | 169-171 |
| 15 | Written Submission M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India (WP (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985) IA 1785 of 2001 Written Submission | 172-182 |
| 16 | Opinion: on the Proposed changes in respect of Foreigners by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for UNCR (April 2003) | 183-198 |
| 17 | M/s Harihar Contgractors vs. State of UP Written Submission on behalf of Respondent No. 4 | 199-243 |
| 18 | Aide-de-memoire: to Kavita Belani-UNHCR | 244-246 |
| 19 | Gaya Ram vs. State of UP, Sp. App. 222of 2003 (from WP1077 (MS) of 2003) Preliminary Submission during argument- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for Private Respondents. | 247-262 |
| 20 | Knorr bremse AG vs.. Escort Ltd. Submission: on the behalf of the respondent (Original Misc. (Civil) Petition No. 383 of 2002). | 163-268 |
| VOLUME-115 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Smt. Babita Aggarwal vs. Dr. S.K. Goel Submission of Amircus Curiae to National Consumer Dispute redressals Commission-OP No. 379/2002 | 1-17 |
| 2. | Smt. Babita Aggarwal vs. Dr. S.K. Goel Submission of Amircus Curiae to National Consumer Dispute redressals Commission-OP No. 379/2003- Compilation of cases and Statutes- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan Amircus Cuirae. | 1-262 |
| VOLUME-116 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Gaya Ram vs. State of UP, Sp. App. 222of 2003 (from WP1077 (MS) of 2003) Preliminary Submission during argument- by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for Private Respondents. | 1A-1P |
| 2. | GAYA Ram vs. State of UP, Sp. App. 222of 2003 (from WP1077 (MS) of 2003-Cases-Rajeev Dhavan Counsel for Private Respondents. | 1-42 |
| VOLUME-117 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Re: State of Punjab vs. Rajinder Kaur Bhattal SLP (Crl.) 148 of 2003. | 1-14 |
| 2. | On the Model Law For Refugees: A Response to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). | 15-46 |
| 3. | Re: M/s. Milk Foods. | 47-52 |
| 4. | Proposition in respect of Tribals in Relation to the Circular of 18 September, 1990. | 53-56 |
| 5. | Synopisis: Tisco Workers Case. | 57-59 |
| 6. | Opinion: Curative Petition in Bhagwat Mahton vs. Prayag Mathon. | 60-64 |
| 7. | Manager, Nirmal Secondary School Society vs. N.I Khan List of Dates. | 65-69 |
| 8. | State of Kerala vs. Pushpagiri Medical Society. | 70-98 |
| 9. | Binny- Notes. | 99-116 |
| 10 | Re: De-Nationalization of HPCL. | 117-122 |
| 11 | Re: Swati Roy vs. Bhaskar Mitra. | 123-127 |
| 12 | Submission: on SICA. | 128-135 |
| 13 | Propositions in Respect of Tribals in relation to the circulars of 18 Sept.1990. | 136-139 |
| 14 | Settlement of the Counter Affidavit- Sanjay Kapur, Advocate. | 140-152 |
| 15 | Re: High Security Motor Plats. | 153-176 |
| 16 | Re: Heinz Italia Dabur India Ltd. advice. | 177-185 |
| 17 | Submission: on the Notification of 7 July, 1995. | 186-188 |
| 18 | M/s Binny Ltd. vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Construction. | 189-196 |
| 19 | Sub: Duncans Industries Ltd. vs., UOI. | 197-222 |
| 20 | Opinion: Contract between the Centre for the Philosophy and Foundations of Science and WGBH Television. | 223-225 |
| 21 | Submission: Signs Limited vs. UOI. | 226-234 |
| 22 | Submission: Manager, Nirmal Secondary School Society vs. N.I. Khan. | 235-248 |
| 23 | Notes toward setting the SIMI Petition | 249-252 |
| 24 | Opinion: to Ruchi Pant on Impeachment proceedings. | 253-254 |
| 25 | Opinion: Christian Dalits being recognized as SC to Franklin Casesar. | 255-257 |
| 26 | War law vs. Union of India. | 258-262 |
| 27 | Indofar Society vs. Director General of Foreign Trade. | 263-267 |
| 28 | Opinion: Hindu Succession Act. 1956 to Ms. Rahat Bano- HT. | 268 |
| VOLUME-118 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| STATUTE AND OTHER MATERIAL | ||
| 1. | Payment of Gratuity ACT, 1972 | 1-31 |
| 2. | Notification Dated 03/04/1997 issued by the Central Government. | 32 |
| 3. | Parliament Debate of the Payment of Gratuity Act. | 33-40 |
| 4. | Chart of Provisions of legislations defining employee. | 41 |
| 2. CASES ON EMPLOYEES | ||
| a. Supreme Court on Other Labour legislations | ||
| 5. | Miss A. Sundrambal vs. Govt. of Goa, Damam & Diu, (1984) 4 SCC 42 on definition of ‘workman’ in the Industries Dispute Act. | 42-50 |
| 6. | Haryana Unrecognized School’s Association vs. State of Haryana, (1996) 4SCC 225 on definition ‘employee’ in Minimum Wages Act. | 51-56 |
| b. High court on Supreme Court to disentitle gratuity for teacher | ||
| 7. | Ved Prakash Nirala vs. State of Bihar,(1991) 1CLR 947 (Patna High Court) | 57-59 |
| 8. | H.E. Education Society Barkheda vs. A.A. under P.G. Act, (2001) 1LLJ 691 (High Court of Madhya Pradesh). | 60-68 |
| 9. | Green Wood School, Dheradun vs. State of UP (2001) II LLJ 1652 (Allahabad High Court) where a Minimum Wages Notification extending the operation of Minimum Wages Act to teacher was stuck down. | 69-70 |
| c. High Court that allow gratuity for teacher | ||
| 10. | Premlata Digambar Rao Deo vs. Principal St. Philomines Convent High School (1997) II LLJ 1050 (Bombay High Court. | 71-79 |
| 11. | General Education Academy Chembur Mumbai vs. Sudha Vasudeo Desai (2001) II LLJ 273 (Bombay High Court) | 80-89 |
| 12. | Gujarat Agricultural University vs. Laxmiben Talaviya (2001) GUJ. LR 182 (Gujarat High Court). | 90-92 |
| Notes: No Decision of the Supreme Court has deal with the issue of entitlement of teachers to Gratuity under the payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 | ||
| 3. CASE ON ESTABLISHMENT UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT. | ||
| 13. | State if Punjab vs. Labour Court (1980) 1 SCC 4 where the Supreme Court took an expansive view of ‘ establishment’ and held also the Payment of gratuity Act is a self- contained Code. | 93-99 |
| 14. | V. Venkateswara Rao vs. Chairman, Governing Body, S.M.V.M. Polytechnic Institute (1997) Lab IC 2543 where the Andhra Pradesh High Court held that Polytechnic institute is an ‘establishment’ under the payment of Gratuity Act. | 100-104 |
| 15. | Andhjan Vividhlaxi Tamil Kendra vs. Pushpaben,(2000) 1 LLJ 124 where the Gujarat High Court held that ‘establishment’ is not restricted to commercial establishment alone under the Payment of Gratuity Act | 105-110 |
| 16. | Nitin Mehata vs. Prafulaben Dalpatri SCA/377/2000 judgment dated 02/05/2000 OF THE Gujarat High Court where ‘establishment’ is extended to educational institutions as well. | 111-123 |
Notes: See also section 1(3) of the payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 The Notification of 03/04/1997 clearly specifies that education Institutions employing
More than ten persons would be ‘establishment’ for the purpose of the payment of Gratuity Act. | ||
| 4. CASE ON MENING OF WORDS IN THEIR STATUTORY CONTEXT | ||
| 17. | Printer (Mysore) Ltd. and Another vs. Asst. Commercial tax Officer (1994) 2SCC 434. | 124-135 |
| 18. | Pushpa Devi vs. Milkhi Ram (1990) 2SCC 134. | 136-145 |
| 5. CASES ON BENEFICIAL CONSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL WELFARE LABOUR LEGISLATIONS | ||
| a. Cases on beneficial legislation generally | ||
| 19. | Harihar Polyfibers vs. Reginal Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation,(1984) 4 SCC 324 | 146-151 |
| 20. | Sayaji Mills vs. Reginal Provident Fund Commissioner, 1984 (Supp) SC 610. | 152-160 |
| 21. | All India Reporter Karamchari Sangh vs. All India Reporter Ltd. 1988 (SUPP) SCC 472. | 161-170 |
| 22. | MRF Ltd. vs. Inspector Kerala Government, (1998) 8SCC 227. | 171-180 |
| 23. | Secretary HSEB vs. Suresh and Others (1999) 3 SCC 601. | 181-194 |
| 24. | Gangahanume Gowda vs. Karnataka Agro-Industries Corporation Ltd. (2003)3 SCC 40. | 195-201 |
| b. Cases on the Limits of beneficial Interpretation | ||
| 25 | Regional Directore, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation Trichur vs. Ramanuja Match Industries (1985)1SCC 218. | 202-209 |
| 26 | Tatoba Bhaurau Savage vs. Vasantrao Deshpande,(2001)8SCC 501. | 210-218 |
| c. Scheme of the Payment to Gratuity Act. Requires wider interpretation | ||
| 27 | Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs. Dharam Prakash Sharma (1998) 7 SCC 221. | 219-221 |
| 28 | EID Parry (1) Ltd. vs. G. Omkar Murthy, (2001) 4 SCC 68. | 222-224 |
| Note: See Generally Preamble and the scheme of the Payment of Gratuity Act, and Parliamentary Debates on the Payment of Gratuity Act. | ||
| 29. | On the meaning of pri-material G.P. Singh Principal of Statutory Interpretation (2002) | 225-230 |
| 30. | Mohd. Zaheeruddin Siddiqui and Executive Council A.M.U. SC 2000-1 LLJ (2000) 9 SCC 48 | 231-232 |
| 31. | Reserve Bank of India vs. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. (1987)1 SCC 424 | 233-263 |
| VOLUME-119 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Deemed Universities and State Quotas. | 1-8 |
| 2. | Ade-de-Memoire: Venatesha Education Society. | 9-15 |
| 3. | Submission: State of Kerala vs. Pushpagiri Medical Society. | 16-25 |
| 4. | Opinion: on Common Entrace Test (EET) | 26-33 |
| 5. | Note: State of Kerala vs. Pushpagiri Medical Society. | 34-47 |
| 6. | Submission : Pushpagiri Medical Society vs. State of Kerala | 48-54 |
| 7. | Opinion: Re NITTE Education Trust. | 55-70 |
| 8. | Opinion: Memorandum on the Proposed draft Karnataka Selection of Candidates for admission to Engineering, Medical, Dental and Indian System of Medicine and Homeopathy Rules 2003. | 71-80 |
| 9. | In Re Institute of Hospital Trust, Dehradun. | 81-98 |
| 10 | Submission: Pushpagiri Medical Society vs. State of Kerala. | 99-126 |
| 11 | Opinion: on Jamia Hamdard University. | 127-130 |
| 12 | Re: Jamia Opinion as Draft Letter. | 131-133 |
| 13 | Submission: Manager, Nirmala secondary School vs. NI Khana. | 134-140 |
| 14 | Submission: Pushpagiri Medical Society vs. State of Kerala. | 141-152 |
| 15 | Opinion: Re : Wigan and Leigh College (I) Ltd. | 153-171 |
| 16 | Settlement of the Counter Affidavit-Sanjay Kapur, Advocate. | 172-184 |
| VOLUME-120 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Re: Pushpagiri Medical College, Thiruvella. | 1-26 |
| 2. | Opinion: Allahabad Agricultural Institute’s Right to devise its own Admission Tests. | 27-62 |
| 3. | Opinion: Re: Aligarh Muslim University- External Common Entrance Tests (CET)- Opinion-I | 63-84 |
| 4. | Re: Aligarh Muslim University- External Common Entrance Tests (CET)- Supplementary to Opinion-I (Re: Aligarh Muslim University- External Common Entrance Tests (CET)- (Opinion-II) | 85-105 |
| 5. | Re: Aligarh Muslim University- External Common Entrance Tests (CET)- Final Opinion | 106-147 |
| 6. | Opinion –B.R Nanda vs. Union of India. | 148-151 |
| 7. | Opinion and Draft curative Petition-Canteen Employees. | 152-160 |
| 8. | Opinion: on curative Petition BHVP Ltd. vs. VHPV Canteen. | 161-165 |
| 9. | Opinion: on Education of food stuffs- Sunita Narain-CSE. | 166-176 |
| 10 | Submission to Election Commission to stop the raiding of the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam. | 177-188 |
| 11 | Opinion: Absolute Vodka. | 189-200 |
| 12 | Opinion: on Addition Protocol on Suppression of Terrorism to UNHCR. | 201-212 |
| 13 | Comments on Professor Poonawala are the Pillar or Islam to OUP. | 213-219 |
| 14 | Re: Andhra Assembly- dissolved. | 220 |
| 15 | Re: Venkatesha Society- Proposition to support the Argument that no further amendment are requires moulding the relief and giving consequential relief. | 221-227 |
| 16 | Opinion: Sarabjeet “rick” singh vs. Union of India. | 228-233 |
| 17 | Submission: on Tenders. | 234-239 |
| 18 | Opinion: in respect of the Draft Lease Deed. | 240-248 |
| 19 | Draft Written Submission on behalf of the Appellant (M/s Tirath Ram Ahuja Ltd). | 249-260 |
| 20 | Opinion and suggestions- Down to Earth (DTE)’s Article on Endosulphan. | 261-264 |
| 21 | Article ‘Governors, politics, Rajasthan’ for Kavita Srivastava. | 265-269 |
| VOLUME-121 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Material on Land acquisition | 1-416 |
| VOLUME-122 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | T. Muralidhar Rao vs. State of A.P-Submission (on the Muslim Demand for Reservation and Submission related there to). | 1-24 |
| 2. | Opinion: With respect to M/s moopan Motors Pvt Ltd. | 25-34 |
| 3. | Submission: Association of registration Plates vs. Union of India. | 35-58 |
| 4. | Submission: Hyundai Engg. Construction Co. Ltd. vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. | 59-62 |
| 5. | Response to proposed Bye-Law 11 (G) (II) and matter relating their to dealing with he rate or property tax to be applied to Charitable Medical Institutions-for D.K. Kapur, Lahore Hospital Society. | 63-72 |
| 6. | Submission: Anoop Nambir vs. Union of India.-Submission (Russian Medical College and Indian Medical Council Act. 1956). | 73-95 |
| 7. | Rajmahal Pahad Bachao vs. Union of India.- Counter affidavit | 96 |
| 8. | Opinion: Students text books Opinion to SAHMAT | 97-111 |
| 9. | David Housego vs. Emily Jenet- Opinion to Adv Malvika Rajkotia. | 112-126 |
| 10 | Opinion: Dalbir Singh vs. state of Haryana. | 127-131 |
| 11 | Anitha Jayadevan vs. Union of India. Opinion to ICMR. | 132-136 |
| 12 | Submission: Shiv Singh Rawat vs. State of Haryana. | 137-139 |
| 13 | Daewoo Power Indian ltd. vs. M.P. Electricity board-application. | 140-150 |
| 14 | Laroia vs. Laroia- to Malvika Rajkotia. | 151-152 |
| 15 | Hindustan Zink Mines at Zawar, Rajasthan, opinion to Mr. S. K. Dhingra, Advocate. | 153-162 |
| 16 | Punjab act of 2004 and the SC reference (the president on the Punjab Termination of Arguments act. 2004) | 163-173 |
| 17 | Opinion : Mallikarjuna swamy vs. Union of India | 174-180 |
| 18 | General Categories welfare Federation, Punjab vs. Union of India. | 181-191 |
| VOLUME-123 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Allocation of seats for post Graduate Medical seats by Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) – Opinion to Adv. Ajaz Maqbool. | 1-19 |
| 2. | .TM. Muralidhar Rao vs. state of A.P.-Note on Demands from Minorities. | 20-24 |
| 3. | The framing of India’s Constitutions select documents- the Project committee- Chairman B. Shiva Rao (vol.2) | 25-37 |
| 4. | Settling of the Tamil Nadu electricity Board SLP to the SC. | 38-44 |
| 5. | Legal Notice by Shri R.K .Singh-in respect of arsenic poisoning in Balia, U.P. (CSE Case). | 45-48 |
| 6. | Legal Notice by Shri Vinod Kumar Malik-in respect poisoning in Balia U.P. (CSE Case). | 49-52 |
| 7. | 6 on R.C. Chandel vs. high Court of M.P. – Compulsory Retirement. | 53-59 |
| 8. | The Lakshmi Vilas Bank ltd. vs. V.G. Krishnamurthy- synopsis. | 60-70 |
| 9. | Yashpal vs. state of Chhatisgarh- chart. | 71-72 |
| 10 | Some further thoughts on the meeting of Friday 19.11/04- Dr. Carol Bachelor, UNHCR. | 73-74 |
| 11 | Re: Bajaj Auto Ltd. vs. Bhojane Gopinath. | 75-77 |
| 12 | TN Electricity Board vs. Central Organization- Draft Letter. | 78-80 |
| 13 | Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State of west Bengal | 81-84 |
| 14 | The GM Indian Overseas Ban, Chennai vs. the Workmen- Rejoinder Affidavit to Petitioner. | 85-92 |
| 15 | S.S. Mahapatra vs. Union of India. | 93-94 |
| 16 | Opinion: VAT and its Constitutional discontents- Prof. Ashok Mitra, Calcutta. | 95-105 |
| 17 | Opinion: on a Refugee Law Regime through Executive Action Opinion to Chief of Mission UNHCR. | 160-127 |
| 18 | Opinion: on Mr. Abdullah Temori to Ms. Sumbul Rizvi, UNHCR. | 128-133 |
| 19 | Aide-de-Memoire: on Khuswant Singh’s History of the Sikh. | 134-142 |
| 20 | Opinion: Ms. Gupta and Prof. Ghosh- National Employment Guarantee Bill. | 143-169 |
| 21 | N. Nolendra Prasad vs. Govt. of A.P.-Draft Counter Affidavit. | 170 |
| 22 | Lahore Hospital Society- Opinion (Lahore Hospital Society under the Shanti Amrit Charitable Trust and the Integrated Health and Healthcare Service India Pvt. Ltd.) | 171-173 |
| VOLUME-124 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | P.A. Inamdar vs. State of Maharashtra. Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. On behalf of Educational Institutions-SLP (C) No. 9932/2004. | 1-26 |
| 2. | P.A. Inamdar vs. State of Maharashtra. Reply Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan On behalf of Educational Institutions-SLP (C) No. 9932/2004. | 27-49 |
| 3. | Compilation: P.A. Inamdar vs. State of Maharashtra. Compilation Submitted in reply by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan Senior Advocate- SLP (C) No. 9932/2004. | 50-69 |
| 4. | Written Submission: Mustaq Mossa Tarani vs. Government of India – Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan-WP (L) No. 269/2005. | 70-94 |
| 5. | Written Submission: Tamil Nadu Electricity Board vs. Central Organization of Tamil Nadu Electricity- Summary of Written Submission by the appellants. W A No. 2351/2004. | 95-105 |
| 6. | Written Submission: Tamil Nadu Electricity Board vs. Central Organization of Tamil Nadu Electricity- Summary of Written Submission in reply W.A. No. 2351/2004. | 106-123 |
| 7. | Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Amtek Geophysical Pvt. Ltd. Written Submission on behalf of the appellants. FAO (OS) No. 230/2004. | 124-127 |
| 8. | General Briefing note for the Notice of motion hearing in the Bombay High Court- Black Friday. (Bombay Blasts of 12/03/1993). | 128-135 |
| 9. | National Rural Employment Guarantee Bill 2004 – Preliminary Submission by PILSARC. | 136-150 |
| 10 | Before the Hon’ble A.P. Backward Classes Commission – Preliminary Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 151-170 |
| 11 | K. Channegowda vs. KPSC- Proposition in Law in SLP (Civil) No. 11589-11693 of 2003. | 171-172 |
| 12 | Opinion: Re: Kalinga Power Corporation | 173-195 |
| 13 | Opinion: Re: Jitendera Pali vs. State of Chhattisgarh | 169-215 |
| VOLUME-125 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Jehovah’s Witness (Siliguri Blood Transfusion Case) | 1-29 |
| 2. | Written Submission Administrator of the specified undertaking of the Unit Trust of India vs. Garware Polyester Ltd. Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 30-48 |
| 3. | Opinion: on the effect of the Notification of 1904/2005 to torrent AEC Power Ltd. by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 49-60 |
| 4. | S.N. Huddar vs. State of Maharashtra- Preliminary Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 61-69 |
| 5. | Submission: Ashok Lanka vs. Rishi Dikshit on the behalf of the original Public Interest Petitioner. | 70-82 |
| 6. | Dr. Naresh Agarwal vs. Union of India. Written Submission on behalf of Respondent No.4 | 83-98 |
| 7. | Supplementary Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for Aligarh Muslim University (R-4 AMU). | 99-102 |
| 8. | Supplementary Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for Aligarh Muslim University (R-4 AMU). | 103-106 |
| 9. | Manvender singh vs. Union of India- I the High Court at Allahabad- Submission reply by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for Aligarh Muslim University. | 107-132 |
| 10 | The first Report on Religion data- Census of India 2001. | 133-138 |
| 11 | Note on the Criminal Protection of the Wildlife Protection act, 1972 (WLPA, 1972) of Sunita Narian, Director CSE. | 139-149 |
| 12 | A Short Note on the right of Forest Dwellers under the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 150-155 |
| VOLUME-126 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Preliminary Written Submission: Kumari Archana Reddy vs. state of AP (in the High Court of AP at Hyderabad) Preliminary Written Submission on Law by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 1-24 |
| 2. | Supplementary Submission: Kumari Archana Reddy vs. State of AP (in the High Court of AP at Hyderabad) Supplementary Submission on Law by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 25-29 |
| 3. | Kumari Archana Reddy vs. state of AP (in the High Court of AP at Hyderabad) A Brief Synopsis on the Educational Backwardness of the Muslim in India from 1858 A.D. by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 30-50 |
| 4. | Opinion: On Text Books – Role of the Union Government by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 51-63 |
| 5. | Settling of the review to be filed by the AICTE in relation to the Judgment of the supreme Court in CA No. 976-8/1999 and 3026/1999. | 64-69 |
| 6. | Summary Note on KN. Chaturvedi vs. Sushma Jain by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 71-76 |
| 7. | Opinion: on Black Friday Case by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 77-80 |
| 8. | Settling the replication in Dalama to Malvika Rajkotia. | 81-84 |
| 9. | Note on United Phosphorus Ltd. vs. Ajit Padiwal | 85-90 |
| 10 | Opinion: Naresh Kumar vs. UOI by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 91-95 |
| 11 | Opinion: Further supplementary observations for Naresh Kumar. | 96-101 |
| 12 | Review- Vinod Kumar Malik vs. Sunita Narain and Ritu Gupta, CSE by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 102-107 |
| 13 | Further Opinion: Review- Vinod Kumar Malik vs. Sunita Narain and Ritu Gupta, CSE by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 108-111 |
| 14 | Drafted written Statement on Balia defamation case for Ritu Gupta and Sunita Narain of CSE by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 112-118 |
| 15 | Note on the Criminal Protection of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, minor revision for Sunita Narian, by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 119-129 |
| 16 | Settling of rejoinder in UT of Dadra and Nagar Havelin vs. Fatehsinh Mohansinh Chauhan for advocate Santosh Paul by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 130-136 |
| 17 | S.N. Huddar vs. State of Maharashtra detailed Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 137-167 |
| 18 | Submission: Ashok Lanka vs. Rishi Dikshit on the behalf of the original Public Interest Petitioner. | 168-179 |
| VOLUME-127 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Preliminary Submission Swamy Prasad Maurya vs. Speaker, Legislative Assembly, UP Preliminary Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan on behalf of Respondent No. 22&26 in the High Court of Allahabad. | 1-23 |
| 2. | Swamy Prasad Maurya vs. Speaker, Legislative Assembly, UP Write Petition No. 5085/2003. | 24-50 |
| 3. | Written Submission: Prem Dhar Pathak vs. State of Uttar Pradesh clubbed With UP Cricket Assn. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh Written Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 51-62 |
| 4. | Submission: State of AP vs. Darius Shapur Chennai and HPCL vs. Darius Shapur Chennai Submission: by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan for Respondent. | 63-81 |
| 5. | Opinion: on appointment under the Centre Vigilance Commission act, 2003 to Mr. Gopal Singh Adv by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 82-92 |
| 6. | Manvender singh vs. Union of India-Summary Submissions Argument on behalf of the AMU by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 93-131 |
| 7. | Dr. Naresh Agarwal vs., UOI Submission of Respondent No.4 AMU. | 132-171 |
| 8. | Re: Clause 6 of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Bill. | 172-174 |
| 9. | Re: Clause 6 of the NEG Bill- Further Queries. | 175-177 |
| 10 | Opinion: Re: K.L. Malhotra vs. Lahore Hospital Society (LHS)- Opinion: by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 178-182 |
| 11 | Opinion and Response- re: Christian Dalit being recognized as SC by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan to T. Franklin Caesar. | 183-185 |
| 12 | Opinion: State of T.N. Vs. Jyendra Saraswati case. | 186-191 |
| VOLUME-128 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: State of Punjab vs. Des Bandhu by the Amicus Curiae Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-35 |
| 2. | Compilation of case State of Punjab vs. Des Bandhu by the Amicus Curiae Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 36-119 |
| 3. | Opinion: on the Extradition Act.1962 to Acting Chief of Mission, UNHCR by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 120-130 |
| 4. | Letter to Brig. Harish Dhavan on Palampur Property. | 131-134 |
| 5. | Written Submission: M/s Viswapriya Financial Service Security Ltd. vs. the Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 135-143 |
| 6. | Written Submission: II& Table of Contents- M/s Viswapriya Financial Service Security Ltd. vs. the Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 144-153 |
| 7. | Opinion: Cairn Energy India Pvt. Ltd. | 154-164 |
| 8. | Proposal for the Wild Life Protection (Amendment) Act, 2005. | 165-173 |
| 9. | Re: Bona, Cleaner. | 174 |
| 10 | Opinion: on getting past SC & HC decision (Re: Rekha Chandok vs. UOI). | 175-177 |
| 11 | Opinion: on NIIT (deemed University status) | 178-193 |
| VOLUME-129 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: M/s Viswapriya Financial Service Security Ltd. vs. the Executive Director, Reserve Bank of India by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 1-55 |
| 2. | Re: Punjab University Case Two Issues. | 56-60 |
| 3. | Compilation :State of Punjab vs. Des Bandhu Compilation of cases- Volume-II | 61-142 |
| 4. | A Note on Ordinance in India and Nepal A Please for Judicial Review. | 143-152 |
| 5. | In Re: GVK Industries Ltd. (Synopsis and Grounds). | 153-160 |
| 6. | Submission: to the Delimitation Commission. | 161-166 |
| 7. | Submission: management of Mettur Beardsell vs. Their Workmen. | 167-181 |
| 8. | The Management of EID Parry India Ltd. vs. Government of TN. | 182-210 |
| VOLUME-130 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | The Management of EID Parry India Ltd. vs. Government of TN.Compilation | 1-243 |
| I | SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE REFERENCE | |
| 1. | News Papers Ltd. vs. State Industrial Tribunal, UP (S) AIR1957 SC 532. | 34-38 |
| 2. | State of Bombay (now Maharadhtra) vs. K.P .Krishnan AIR 1960 SC1223. | 39-44 |
| 3. | Bombay Union of Journalists vs. the State of Bombay AIR 1964SC 1617. | 45-49 |
| 4. | Hochtief Gammon vs. State of Orissa (1975)2 SCC 649. | 50-56 |
| 5. | Ram Avtar Sharma vs. State of Haryana (1985) 3 SCC 189. | 57-61 |
| 6. | Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu. (1987) 1 LLJ (HC. Madras). | 62-73 |
| 7. | Taluka Panchyat Visnagar vs. Ichhaben Shivram Dave (1999) SCC (L&S) 1083. | 74 |
| 8. | National Engineering Industries Ltd. vs., State of Rajasthan (2000) 1 SCC371. | 75-88 |
| 9. | Nedungadi Bank Ltd. Vs. K.P. Madhavankutty (2000)2 SCC 455. | 89-92 |
| 10 | MD, A.P. State Road Transport Corp. vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal Ramkote (2001) 2 SCC 695. | 93-98 |
| 11 | Moolchand Khatri Ram Hospital K. Union vs. Commissioner (2002) 10 SCC 708. | 99 |
| 12 | ONGC Madras Port Contract Employees Union vs. Management of ONGC Ltd. 2005 (2) CTC 1. | 100-114 |
| II | INTERPREATION OF SECTION 25-FF | |
| 1. | Anakapalle Co-operative Agricultural and Industrial Society Ltd. vs. Workmen AIR 1963 SC 1489. | 116-120 |
| 2. | Shankar Text Mills vs. Workmen (1963) II LLJ 68. | 121 |
| 3. | The Management of Madho Ram and Sons vs. the Workmen AIR 1964 SC 645. | 122-124 |
| 4. | Workmen of Brahmputra Tea Estate vs. Incoming Management of Brahmputra Tea Estates AIR 1968SC 514. | 125-127 |
| 5. | Payment of wages Inspector vs. Surajmal Mehtra, Director AIR1969 sc 590. | 128-131 |
| 6. | Gurmail Singh vs. State of Punjab (1991) 1 SCC189. | 132-144 |
| 7. | Bharat Coca Cola Bottling South East Pvt. Ltd. vs. Govt. of AP.2002 (1) ALD 103 (decided on 26.04.2001). | 145-153 |
| 8. | Maruti Udyog Ltd. vs. Ram Lal (2005)2 SCC 638. | 154-162 |
| III | RES JUDICATA APPLIED TO INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS | |
| 1. | Aulia Bidi Factory, Burhanpur vs. Industrial Tribunal Indore (1966)1 LLJ | 164-167 |
| 2. | Hochties Gammon vs. State of Orissa (1975) 2 SCC 649. | 168-173 |
| 3. | Mathew Areeparmatil vs. State of Bihar (1985) 2 SCC 102. | 174-177 |
| 4. | Bharat Barrel and Drun Mfg. Co. vs. Bharat Barrel Employee Union (1987)2 SCC 591. | 178-190 |
| 5. | Junior Telecom officer Forum vs. Union of India.1993 SUPP. (4) SCC 693. | 191-205 |
| 6. | BLUE Star Employees Union vs. Ex. Off. Principal Secy. To Govt. (2000)8 SCC 94. | 206-210 |
| 7. | Executive Engineer, ZP Eng. Vs. Digambara Rao (2004) 8 SCC 262. | 211-220 |
| IV | CIVIL DISPUTES IN A CIVIL COURT NOT AN INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL. | |
| 1. | Rajasthan Road Transport Corporation vs. Krishna Kant (1995) SCC 75. | 221-243 |
| VOLUME-131 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission & List of Dates the Aligarh Muslim University vs. Dr. Naresh Agarwal by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-66 |
| 2. | Opinion: Re; Raja Chandra Vijay Singh to Ms. Malvika Rajkota. | 67-72 |
| 3. | Reply Submission the EID Parry India Ltd. vs. Govt. of TN. by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 73-89 |
| 4. | Re: Changes in the Scheduled ribes (Recognition of Forest Bill)2005 | 90-102 |
| 5. | A Note on ordinance in India and Nepal: A plea for Judicial Review by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 103-112 |
| 6. | Submission: the Hindustan Shipping and Weaving mills Ltd. vs. Bombay Environment Action group by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 113-132 |
| 7. | Re: Selection of Students in Professional College in the State of UP. | 133-139 |
| 8. | Re: settling in EID Parry SLP by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 140-145 |
| 9. | Submission: GM Indian Overseas Bank vs. Workmen All India Overseas Bank Employees union by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 146-159 |
| 10 | Opinion: Tamil Nadu Cable Bill by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 160-170 |
| 11 | Preliminary Written Submission: Inderpreet Singh Kahlon vs. State of Punjab by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 171-189 |
| 12 | Reply Written Submission: Inderpreet Singh Kahlon vs. State of Punjab by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 190-209 |
| 13 | Written Submission: Avas Vikas Sansthan Engineers Association by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 210-226 |
| VOLUME-132 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: D. Ravi Kumar vs. the Management of TI Diamond Chain Ltd. against the common Award dtd. 31/10/2005 of the Principal Labour Court. | 1-14 |
| 2. | List of Dates- Manipal Academy of Higher Education vs. UOI Write Petition No. 12673/05 | 15-27 |
| 3. | Submission: Manipal Academy of Higher Education vs. UOI. | 28-42 |
| 4. | List of Dates Satyabhama Institute of Science & Technology vs. UOI. | 43-50 |
| 5. | Preliminary Submission Satyabhama Institute of Science & Technology vs. UOI. | 51-68 |
| 6. | Written Submission: Amarjit Kaur vs. Karmvir Singh. | 69-78 |
| 7. | Synopsis- CBI-CID (Subramanian). | 79-81 |
| 8. | Synopsis-General Secretary.MP Kyola Mazdur Case. | 82-84 |
| 9. | Settlement opinion HPCL vs. Western rolling Mills. | 85-91 |
| 10 | Submission: popular Muthiah vs. State of Tamil Nadu. | 92-103 |
| 11 | Submission: Noida Entrepreneurs Assn. vs. Noida. | 104-158 |
| 12 | Extract from the Minutes of Meeting of the Executive Committee of the Lahore Hospital Society held on 28.04.2006 | 159 |
| 13 | Issues foe Consideration on behalf of the petitioner Submitted by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 160 |
| 14 | Written Submission: M.P. Gagadharan vs. State of Kerala. | 161-168 |
| 15 | The principal behind Common Law Judicial review of Administrative action the search Continues Federal Law Review. | 169-191 |
| VOLUME-133 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: M. Nagaraj vs. UOI (WP No.61 of 2002) and general Candidates Welfare Categories Federation Punjab vs. UOI (WP No. 81/2002).Final Reply Submission. | 1-76 |
| 2. | Submission: M. Nagaraj vs. UOI | 77-122 |
| 3. | Preliminary Submission M. Nagaraj vs. UOI. | 123-128 |
| 4. | Preliminary Submission-Part-I M. Nagaraj vs. UOI. | 129-141 |
| 5. | Submission part-II M. Nagaraj vs. UOI. | 142-172 |
| 6. | Submission: on Article 16(4B) in the light of the Oral Arguments M. Nagaraj vs. UOI. | 173-195 |
| 7. | Balancing to Evolve Solution Tentative proposals M. Nagaraj vs. UOI. | 196-199 |
| VOLUME-134 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Smt. Rashid Bano by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-42 |
| 2. | Submission: State of Punjab vs. Des Bandhu by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 43-88 |
| 3. | Out line of argument and List of Dates Dr. S Sagunarthy vs. J. Rasaranjan | 89-102 |
| 4. | Opinion: to CSE Re: Endosulphan by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 103-110 |
| 5. | Opinion: Sikkim Manipal University by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 111-121 |
| 6. | Opinion: Re: admission of Student in Christian Medical College Vellore by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 122-147 |
| 7 | Opinion: Gujarat Agricultural University by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 148-154 |
| 8. | Preliminary Note on Debt Relief to Prof. Prabhat Patnaik by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 155-164 |
| 9. | Opinion: appointment of a Minister as President of the All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 165-172 |
| 10 | Six document to Sunita Narain by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 173-212 |
| 11 | Submission: J .Jayalalitha vs. UOI by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 213-216 |
| 12 | Re: Manjuli Cultural Landscape Region Bill 2006 | 217-220 |
| 13 | Mrs. Deepak Kalra vs. Nathumal Kankilal Trust Person with Disabilities. | 221-223 |
| 14 | Re: Banning of Certain Aerated Drinks in Kerala –Note | 224-227 |
| VOLUME-135 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: R.K. Mittal vs. Delhi Development Authority by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-37 |
| 2. | Submission: State of Orissa vs. GMR Technologies Ltd. by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 38-76 |
| 3. | Submission: Manipal Academy of Higher Education vs. UOI by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 77-95 |
| 4. | Opinion: Twinning Programmes of Manipal Academy of higher Education (Mahe) by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 96-114 |
| 5. | PILSARC’s Proposal Re- Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill 2006to India Council for Medical Research. | 115-133 |
| 6. | Opinion: Governor’s power and the Rajasthan Conversion Bill by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 134-143 |
| 7. | Submission: Noble Resources Ltd. vs. State of Orissa by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 144-162 |
| 8. | Adding insult to Injury: The Rajasthan Dharma Swatantrya Bill 2006 by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 163-200 |
| 9. | Submission: prudential Co-op Bank Ltd. vs. B.S. Raj Chakrapani by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 201-229 |
| VOLUME-136 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Chief Engineer of BPDP vs. M/s Scott Wilson Kirkpatrick by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-28 |
| 2. | List of dates and Submission: on behalf of the Respondent NDMC vs. Tanvi Trading & Credit Pvt. Ltd. | 29-58 |
| 3. | Submission: R.K. Mittal vs. Delhi Development Authority Drafted by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 59-71 |
| 4. | Final Submission: R.K. Mittal vs. Delhi Development Authority by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 72-127 |
| 5. | Revised Submission: Prabhat Kumar Sharma vs. State of Bihar by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 128-144 |
| 6. | Submissions in law-Prabhat Kumar Sharma vs. UPSC. | 145-158 |
| 7. | Prabhat Kumar Sharma vs. UPSC Thematic Note of facts and Issues in the Case | 159-164 |
| 8. | A note re: Misleading concern about the Wild life (Protection) Amendment Bill 2006. | 165-179 |
| 9. | Interpreting the Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2006. | 180-187 |
| VOLUME-137 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Pushpagiri Medical Society Vs. State of Kerala by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-25 |
| 2. | Thematic list of Dates Pushpagiri Medial Society vs. State of Kerala. | 26-37 |
| 3. | Out Line Submissions in Law- Pushpagiri Medial Society vs. State of Kerala. | 38-45 |
| 4. | Submission in reply Rajendra Singh Rana vs. Swami Prasad Maurya. | 46-70 |
| 5. | Submission in reply Rajendra Singh Rana vs. Swami Prasad Maurya. | 71-101 |
| 6. | Compilation SLP Vinod Kumar vs. Swami Prasad Maurya. | |
| VOLUME-138 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: Setapak Heights. Dev SDN BHD vs. Tekno Kota SDN BHD by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-32 |
| 2. | Response to Queries in email dated 04/01/2007 on Section 56 being positive Law. | 33-36 |
| 3. | List of Dates and Submission-NDMC vs. Tanvi Trading & Credit P Ltd. | 37-66 |
| 4. | Submission: UP Gram Panchyat Adhikari Sangh vs. Daya Ram Saroj. | 67-85 |
| 5. | Submission: NOIDA Entrepreneurs Assn. vs. Noida. | 86-92 |
| 6. | Kerala Framers Debt. Relief Commission Bill 2006 red | 93-110 |
| VOLUME-139 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Ajay vs. Bangalore Development Authority. | 1-43 |
| 2. | Opinion: Karnataka Panchayat Amendment Bill 2007 to Nandana Reddy. | 44-50 |
| 3. | Opinion: Inclusion of Sikkim in the 6TH Schedule to Gyatso Tongden. | 51-64 |
| 4. | Submission: Re: Arunims Barcah. | 65-71 |
| 5. | Opinion: Parkash Singh vs. Union of India. | 72-90 |
| 6. | Opinion: Import of Harley- Davidsons. | 91-93 |
| 7. | Submission: Gupta Modern Breweries vs. State of J&K. | 94-107 |
| 8. | Chart of Cases on tax and Fee. | 108-115 |
| 9. | Written submission to the Standing Committee on Law Justice Parliament of India (Re: the Judge Enquiry Bill,2006) | 116-140 |
| 10. | List of Dates and Submission on Law- Lokeseva Shikshan Mandal vs. Amrutlal Ramlal Mundhada Charitable Trust. | 141-148 |
| 11. | Submission: Akhilesh Yadav vs. Vishwanath Chaturvedi. | 149-161 |
| 12. | Submission: Amirjit Kaur vs. Karamvir Singh. | 162-171 |
| 13. | Opinion: Re: Shahtoosh. | 172-177 |
| 14. | Re: State of UP vs. Gyur Hasan Khan, SLP (Crl) No. 602/2007. | 178-179 |
| 15. | Synopsis- Opinion Maharaja Martand Singh Rewa. | 180-182 |
| 16. | Re: Gauri Mehra vs. Vivek Mehra and the Application. | 183-185 |
| 17. | Re: Nalini Mehta. | 186 |
| 18. | Letter to Secretary, Ministry of Health in recognition of MBBS Degree award by the Kathmandu University (Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhra Nepal. | 187-194 |
| 19. | Aide-de Memoire- on the Resolution of Dispute in the Udayar Group. | 195-198 |
| 20. | Memorandum of understanding between M. Ethurajan and M. Nandagopal etc. | 199-2003 |
| VOLUME-140 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Opinion: of AP. Ordinance 4 of 2007 | 1. |
| 2. | Written Submission : on the behalf of Petitioner in Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. vs. Daelim Industries Co. Ltd. SLP (C) No.20989 of 2006. | 32-51 |
| 3. | Reply submission on behalf of Petitioner in Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. vs. Daelim Industries Co. Ltd. SLP (C) No.20989 of 2006. | 52-67 |
| 4. | Submission: in Claim under issue H. | 68 |
| 5. | Submission: in Claim under issue A. | 69 |
| 6. | Synopsis or Preliminary Paragraphs for Curative petition (Vinay Kumar Singhal). | 70-72 |
| 7. | Synopsis and List of Dates. | 73-74 |
| 8. | Re: Bharat Petroleum Corpn Ltd. vs. Maddula Ratnavalli. | 75-78 |
| 9. | Written Submission : in Talat Fatima Hasan vs. Nawab Syed Murtaza Ali | 79-111 |
| 10 | Submission: in State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Smt. Rashid Bano. | 112-153 |
| 11 | Youth for Equality forum vs. Union of India Note on Questions to be formulated. | 154-155 |
| 12 | Submission: in Consortium of Self- Financing Professional WP No. 20212/2007 | 156-164 |
| 13 | Opinion: On Mahathir Defamation Case | 165-170 |
| 14 | Opinion: Bharat Petroleum vs. Maddula Ratnavalli. | 171-177 |
| 15 | Submission: on behalf of Prof. Bidyut Chakravarty. | 178-188 |
| 16 | Information Submitted to SC as Amicus in Gujjar Controversy. | 189-200 |
| 17 | In re: Destruction of Public and Private Properties. | 201-223 |
| VOLUME-141 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: on behalf of Petitioner in K.P. Chandrawanshi vs. NTPC Ltd. SLP (C) No 10532 of 2004. | 1-20 |
| 2. | Written Submission: on the behalf of Petitioner in Chandi Ram vs. State of Haryana SLP (C) 25of 2006. | 21-41 |
| 3. | Note – on the Scheduled Tribe and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Right) Rules, 2007. | 42-51 |
| 4. | Opinion: Settling. | 52-59 |
| 5. | Opinion: Re: Lafarge Umiam mining Pvt. Ltd. | 60-73 |
| 6. | Preliminary Submission: Re: Training and Advanced Studies in Management and Communication. | 74-81 |
| 7. | Opinion: Re: Karnataka Estates ltd., SLP ( C) No. 2007 | 82 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re: AP Ordinance No. 4 of 2007. | 83-113 |
| 9. | Final Written Submission: on the behalf of the Petitioners in Singapore Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu, WP No. 6243-4 of 2006. | 114-158 |
| 10 | Preliminary Written Submission on behalf of the Petitioner Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu, WP No. 6243-4 of 2006. | 159-198 |
| 11 | Short Submission: on behalf of the Petitioner Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu. | 199-205 |
| 12 | Affidavit of the Petitioner. Realty Pvt. Ltd. vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu. | 206-214 |
| VOLUME-142 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Note on the Question to be Formulated in all India Equality Forum vs. Union of India WP (C) No 53/2007. | 1-2 |
| 2. | Summary of Submissions on behalf of the Petitioners in all India Equality Forum vs. Union of India WP (C) No 53/2007. | 3-31 |
| 3. | Written Submission: on behalf of the Petitioners in all India Equality Forum vs. Union of India WP (C) No 53/2007. | 32-107 |
| 4. | Reply Submission: on behalf of the Petitioners in all India Equality Forum vs. Union of India WP (C) No 53/2007 | 108-128 |
| VOLUME-143 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Written Submission: on behalf of the Petitioners in M. Balakrishna Reddy vs. Director, CBI, SLP ( C ) No. 1175/2007 | 1-25 |
| 2. | Written Submission: on behalf of the Petitioners in M/s. Swami Publicity Service vs. the Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department and Ors. SLP (C) No. 15698/2006 and connected matters. | 26-46 |
| 3. | Opinion: Re: Lafarge Umiam Mining Pvt. Ltd. | 47-66 |
| 4. | Opinion: Re: Training and Advanced Studies in Management and Communication. | 67-74 |
| 5. | Opinion: Re: Training and Advanced Studies in Management and Communication. | 75-88 |
| 6. | Opinion: Re: Lahore Hospital Society- Complaint by Various Employees. | 89-94 |
| 7. | Opinion: reorder dated 05/10/2007 passed by the Supreme court of India in O.S.No.1/2007 and O.S. No.3/2007 and matters related there to. | 95-97 |
| 8. | Draft request to the Prime Minister for an Urgent Personal Meeting in respect of the Waters of the Ravi Beas System and Projects Related There to. | 98-99 |
| 9. | Opinion: and settling in Re: Air India Cabin Crew Association vs. Union of India. | 100-106 |
| VOLUME-144 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No |
| 1. | Submission: Suo moto Cognizance of a Program captioned operation Kalank by the NHRC | 1-20 |
| 2. | Submission: State of West Bengal vs. Central Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. | 21-34 |
| 3. | Submission: Case on Diesel as Public Health Initiative. | 35-41 |
| 4. | Submission: White Industries Australia Ltd. vs. Coal India Ltd. | 42-66 |
| 5. | Opinion: Applicability of the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 to the Uttarkhand State Transport Corporation. | 67-77 |
| 6. | M/S Fridabad Gurgoan Minerals Ltd. vs. Orissa Mining Corporation. | 78-88 |
| 7. | M/S S. S. company vs. Orissa Mining Corporation Submission Judicial Review and Tenders | 89-94 |
| 8. | M/s S. S. Company vs. Orissa Mining Corporation Submission and Malafide. | 95-114 |
| 9. | Opinion: on Write Petition by Boutique Hotels Ltd. | 115-132 |
| 10 | Submission: M/s. Trig Guard Ltd. vs., State of Maharashtra. | 133-145 |
| 11 | Opinion: Mrs. Usha Haley. | 146-151 |
| 12 | Tassadaq Hussain vs. Mohd. Rashid Qureshi. | 152-161 |
| 13 | Opinion: Complaint of High-handed and threatening behavior of Sh. D. Rathi. | 162-163 |
| 14 | The Consultation and Ratification of Treaties Bill, 2007 | 164-170 |
| 15 | Opinion: Legal case in respect of Diesel sale in Delhi. | 171-212 |
| 16 | Permissibility of third Floor Construction in Delhi (Dalbir Kapur) | 213-259 |
| 17 | NDMC vs. Tanvi Trading. | 260-288 |
| VOLUME-145 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page. No |
| 1. | M. Bal Krishna Reddy v Director, CBI – Submissions | 1 |
| 2. | DPCC Opinion | 24 |
| 3. | Kewal Krishna Mayor v Kailash Chand Mayor | 35 |
| 4. | Anand Mallick v State of Bihar | 47 |
| 5. | Applicability of the Payment of Bonus Act to USTC | 50 |
| 6. | Further opinion on USTC | 61 |
| 7. | Haryana Roadways v Labour Court, Hissar | 63 |
| 8. | Director of Industries and Commerce, Madras v K. Vallaichamy | 66 |
| 9. | DP Kelkar v Ambadas Keshav Bajaj | 68 |
| 10. | Manipal Academy of Higher Education v Provident Fund Commissioner | 88 |
| 11. | Manipal Academy of Higher Education v Provident Fund Commissioner – Related Cases | 91 |
| 12. | Principles of Statutory Interpretation – on ejusdem generis | 146 |
| 13. | Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. v Daelim Industrial Co Ltd | 167 |
| 14. | Noida Entrepreneurs Associations v Noida and Ors. – Aid-de-Memoire | 172 |
| VOLUME-146 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No |
| 1. | All India Equality vs. Union of India. | 1-22 |
| 2. | T.N. Godavarman Thirumalpad vs. Union of India | 23-34 |
| 3. | Re: Mrs. Usha Haley (Preliminary) | 35-44 |
| 4. | Anusuyaben Sadashiv Jadav &Ors. vs. Union of India | 45-51 |
| 5. | Jammu & Kashmir &Ors. Vs. Javed Iqbal Balwan & Ors. | 52-58 |
| 6. | Opinion: St. Stephen College | 59-65 |
| 7. | Submission: Union of India vs. Pushpa Rani | 66-131 |
| 8. | Opinion: MP State Co. Bank vs. Shri Nanuram Yadav and Ors. | 132 |
| 9. | Submission: O. Fernandez vs. Union of India | 133-146 |
| 10 | Submission: Kishore Rungta vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. | 147-166 |
| 11 | Balco Employees’ Union vs. Union of India | 167-170 |
| 12 | Tibet Case for Independence | 171-173 |
| VOLUME-147 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Speech of 25th November 1949 from Constituent Assembly Debate Vol. XI. | 1 |
| 2. | Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Speech of 4th November 1948 from Constituent Assembly Debate Vol. VII. | 2-3 |
| 3. | Table showing Commission on Backward Classes Extract is taken from S.R. Pandian, J in Indra Sawhney V. Union of India 1992 Supp 3 SCC 217 at page 367-368 | 4-5 |
| 4. | Table showing Commission on Backward Classes Extract is taken from S.R. Pandian, J in Indra Sawhney V. Union of India 1992 Supp 3 SCC 217 at page 360-363 | 6-9 |
| 5. | Showing Backward Classes exited from 19th Century (table from Dr. Rajeev Dhavan) “Reserved” How Parliament debated Reservation 1995-2007” pg 208-217 | 10-19 |
| 6. | The Constituent Assembly Debate dated 22nd November 1948 Vol. VII on Article 31-A Pg 520-527 | 20-28 |
| 7. | The farming of India’s Constitution: A study pg. 330-331 | 29-31 |
| 8. | Study on EWRs in Panchayati Raj Institution. | 32-34 |
| 9. | A Brief History an background: A Mid Term Review and Appraisal 22 Nov.2006, Ministry of Panchayati Raj (GOI) | 35-44 |
| 10 | Anugrah Narain Singh vs. State of UP AIR 1992 ALL.62. | 45-71 |
| 11 | The State of Panchayats- 2007-2008 Volume-I Thematic Report of 12th April 2008 with other material (Colly) | 72-104 |
| 12 | Panchayat and Women Article by Mirmala Buch | 105-112 |
| 13 | Reservation for Women: the way forwarded by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 113-158 |
| 14 | Gandhi Talisman | 159 |
| 15 | Union of India and another vs. K.P. Prabhakarn (1997) 11 SCC 638. | 160-161 |
| 16 | Government of AP. vs. P.B .Vijay Kumar and Other (1995) 4 SCC 520 | 162-170 |
| VOLUME-148 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Lok Sabha debate on Constitution (72nd Amendment) Bill 1991 and Constitution (73rd Amendment) Bill Motion for Reference to joint Committee. | 1-3 |
| 2. | Lok Sabha debate on Constitution (72nd Amendment) Bill 1991 and Constitution (73rd Amendment) Bill Motion for Reference to joint Committee. | 4-5 |
| 3. | Lok Sabha debate on Constitution (72nd Amendment) on 21/12/19992 and 02/12/1992. | 6-45 |
| 4. | Lok Sabha debate on Constitution (72nd Amendment) on 21/12/19992 and 02/12/1992. | 46-101 |
| 5. | Rajya Sabha Debate on Constitution (73rd Amendment) Bill on 23/12/1992. | 101A-137 |
| 6. | Report to the joint Committee on the Constitution (73rd Amendment) Bill 1991. | 138-154 |
| 7. | Back to future: Panchayats and Governance-the New movement (by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan). | 155-175 |
| 8. | K.K. Krishna Murthy vs. Union of India. Submission. | 176-24 |
| VOLUME-149 | ||
| Sl. N. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission Birendra Oraon vs. Union of India | 1-9 |
| 2. | Letter to Centre for Science and Environment. | 10 |
| 3. | Preliminary Submission to CSC Re: regard Fuel Economy Standards | 11-28 |
| 4. | Written Submission on the Behalf of the Respondent Sanghi Brothers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Sanjay Choudhary and Ors. | 29-35 |
| 5. | Written Submission for the petitioner Prabha Mathur and Anrs. Vs. Pramodh Kumar | 36-47 |
| 6. | Written Submission on the behalf of respondent No 4; Steel Authority of India vs. State of West Bengal. | 48-62 |
| 7. | Opinion Re: Kerala intellectual property right Policy (of 2007) | 63-73 |
| 8. | Written Submission Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd. vs. Sunil Nirnjan Jhaveri | 74-87 |
| 9. | Short Submission for Petitioner : Manipal Academy of Higher Education vs. Provident Fund Commissioner | 88-90 |
| 10 | List of Dates and Notes: State of Madhya Pradesh vs. V.V. Asthana | 91-100 |
| 11 | Submission Birendra Oraon vs. Union of India and others | 101-111 |
| 12 | Later to India Environment | 112-114 |
| 13 | Article of Raj Thackeray and the temple of Doom | 115-117 |
| 14 | Opinion for BALCO | 118-132 |
| 15 | Later to Atul Chitlay Adv. | 133 |
| 16 | Opinion Re: Lawyer’s forum for Social Justice. | 134-136 |
| 17 | Submission In Re: Destruction of Public & Private Properties (a report on Media Responsibility) | 137-188 |
| 18 | Opinion: Kanhaiya Lal State of Rajasthan & Ors. | 189-190 |
| 19 | A Schematic note for Ashma Jehangir | 191-196 |
| VOLUME-150 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | In Re: Destruction of Public and Pvt. Property WP (Crim) 77 of 2007 – Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Amicus Curiae (23 March 2009). | 1-43 |
| 2. | MRF v. State of Goa, CA No.4219 & 4214 of 2002 – Submission by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 44-69 |
| 3. | Opinion on Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949 by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 70-88 |
| 4. | Submissions – C.H. Balamohan v. UOI by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 89-115 |
| 5. | Comments on Draft Award O Justice MB Shah and Justice AP Rawani on Re: ONGC v. Amar Shipbuilding Plant by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 116-126 |
| 6. | Submissions – Sahakar Agencies v. MSRDC (WP No.2584 of 2008) by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 127-153 |
| 7. | Submission – State of WB v. Central Glass Indus. (CA-372/2005) Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 154-165 |
| 8. | A Schematic Note for ASMA Jehangir. | 166-173 |
| 9. | Synopsis on West Bengal v. Ratnagiri. | 174-176 |
| 10. | Letter opinion to Centre for Philosophy and Foundation of Science. | 177-179 |
| 11. | Opinion Sought by Ms. Malini Latthe – given by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 180-186 |
| 12. | Opinion in r/o Heinz Ilalia v. Dabur India Ltd. by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 187-207 |
| 13. | Parliament or Legislature’s curative power. | 208-214 |
| 14. | Submissions – T. Murlidhar Rao v. State of AP by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 215-237 |
| 15. | Opinion and settling – Promotion to the post of Dy. General Manager. | 238-242 |
| 16. | Letter opinion – Retirement of General to Sh. Govinda Bandi, Nepal. | 243-248 |
| VOLUME-151 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Final Submisions – T. Muralidhar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh by Rajeev Dhavan. | 1-72 |
| 2. | Submisions – T. Muralidhar Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh by Rajeev Dhavan. | 73-95 |
| 3. | Opinion on the denial of promotion of Mr. H.S. Hoon, AGM, P&S Bank. | 96-101 |
| 4. | Submission – Manipal Academy of Higher Education and UOI (WP No.12673/2005). | 102-121 |
| 5. | Submission – Manipal Academy of Higher Education and UOI (WP No.13391/2008). | 122-147 |
| 6. | Submission – Bhavesh Jaynti v. State of Maharashtra. | 148-191 |
| 7. | Submission – Yash Ahuja v. MCI (SLP 26777 of 2008). | 192-204 |
| 8. | The Morning After the Night Before. | 205-207 |
| 9. | Further grounds suggested to Mr. Gopalan | 208-209 |
| 10. | Aide-de-Memoire (Re: Claim of interest for 7-8 Upper Square Old Isleworth). | 210-211 |
| 11. | Aide-De-Memoire: Restraint of Trade (Re: Rajiv Khanna). | 212-225 |
| VOLUME-152 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Submissions – B.S. Industries, Orissa v. UOI | 1-30 |
| 2. | Submission-1 – Suo Motu WP 3335/09 of 2009 (on Advocate Strike and Police Action). | 31-58 |
| 3. | Final Submissions – Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. | 59-85 |
| 4. | Submissions – Ramdas Athawale vs. Union of India. | 86-121 |
| 5. | Note on Ravinder Nath Puri’s notice | 122-124 |
| 6. | List of Dates and Submissions + Land Acquisition Acts 1967 and 1984 – Dalchand Tyagi v. Union of India | 125-164 |
| 7. | Submissions – Bhavesh Jayanti v. State of Mahrashtra. | 165-264 |
| 8. | Submissions – Commercial Auto Sales v. Auto Sales (Properties). | 265-271 |
| 9. | Submissions and List of Dates – Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. | 272-278 |
| 10. | Submissions – Orissa Mining Corpn. Ltd. v. Orissa Chrome Export Mining Co. Ltd. | 279-293 |
| 11. | Opinion – Arvind Kumar Sharma. | 294-299 |
| 12. | Submissions – J&S Constructions v. The MD, Kerala Transport Dev. Fin. Corporation Ltd. | 300-304 |
| 13. | Submissions – Jamshedpur Contractor Workers’ Union v. The Management of Tata Iron & Steel Company. | 305-335 |
| 14. | Opinion – Som Datt Builders. | 336-343 |
| 15. | Note on Disqualification. | 344-345 |
| 16. | Submissions – J&S Construction v. The MD, Kerala Transport Dev. Finance Corpn. Ltd. | 346-350 |
| 17. | Submissions -Jharkand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India | 351-354 |
| 18. | Submissions – Dalmia Cement Ltd. v. Tamil Nadu. | 355-382 |
| VOLUME-153 | ||
| S. No. | PARTICULAR | Page No. |
| 1 | Opinion Re: Damage in Death Cases | 1-39 |
| 2. | Opinion Re: Green Orchards | 40-60 |
| 3. | Supplementary Submission of Behalf of Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board | 61-72 |
| 4. | Submission on Behalf of Rajasthan Pollution Control Board | 73-80 |
| 5. | Written Submission: M/s B.S. Industries, Orissa v. Union of India | 81-116 |
| 6. | Opinion Re: Pension Option of JNU Employees | 117-129 |
| 7. | Opinion Re: Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay | 130-146 |
| 8. | Opinion Re: Puravankura Project Ltd. | 147-164 |
| 9. | Written Submission and List of Dates on Behalf of State of Bihar | 165-190 |
| 10. | Submission: on Behalf of the Respondents Govt. of A.P. v. P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy & Anrs. | 191-196 |
| 11. | Opinion Re: Today Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. | 197-216 |
| 12. | Submission: on behalf of petitioners P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy v. Govt. of A.P | 217-226 |
| 13. | Submission in Replay on Behalf of Petitioner M/s B.S. Industries Orissa v. Union of India and Ors. | 227-241 |
| 14. | Submission: Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science Technology Environment and Forest on the national Green Tribunal Bill2009 | 242-285 |
| 15. | Submission: Parliamentary Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture on the National Commission for Heritage Sites Bill | 286-309 |
| VOLUME-154 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Written Submission for Petitioner: Shanti Budhiya Vesta Patel and Ors v. Nirmala Jayprakash Tiwari and Ors. | 1-30 |
| 2. | Submission on the behalf of the Petitioner: Manipal Academy of Higher Education and Anothers v. Union of India. | 31-50 |
| 3. | Submission on the behalf of the Petitioner: Manipal Academy of Higher Education and Anothers v. Union of India. | 51-76 |
| 4. | Written Submission on behalf of Petitioner: A. Bhuvandera v. Union of India. | 77-88 |
| 5. | Written Submission: Biman Basu v. Kalol Guha Thakurta . | 89-110 |
| 6. | Submission: Biman Basu v. Kalol Guha Thakurta (Extracts, Contempt of Court and the Press 1983 Chapter -II & III). | 111-179 |
| 7. | Submission: Parliamentary Standing Committee on Social Science and Technology Environment and Forest on the National Green Tribunal Bill 2009 on behalf of PILSARC -OCTOBER 2009). | 180-224 |
| 8. | Suggested draft Order – Sri balaji Nagar Residential Association represented by its President, Puzhal, Chennai v. The Government of Tamil Nadu. | 225-230 |
| 9. | Opinion – JNU Teachers Reservation Query. | 231-244 |
| MANIPAL – I Volume No. 155 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission – Manipal Academy of Higher Education v. UOI. | 1-43 |
| 2. | CASES AND RELEVANT EXTRACTS. TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnatka (2002) 8 SCC 481. | 44-63 |
| 3. | Bharati Vidyapeeth v. State of Maharashtra (2004) 11 SCC 755. | 64-75 |
| 4. | Col. A.s. Iyer v. Balasubramanyam (1980) 1 SCC 634 pr. 57-58. | 76-82 |
| 5. | Mohinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner (1978) 1 SCC 405 pr. 8. | 83-89 |
| 6. | Krishena Kumar v. Union of India (1990) 4 SCC 207 pr. 19, 20. | 90-92 |
| 7. | Union of India v. Major Bahadur Singh (2006) 1 SCC 368. | 93-101 |
| 8. | B.R. Ambedkar Medical /college v. Union of India AIR 2005 Karnataka 50 prs. 17, 23, 24, 27, 28, 36, 43, 52. | 102-132 |
| 9. | Bhuwalka Steel Industries v. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Board (2010) 2 SCC 273, pr. 68, 69, 70. | 133-178 |
| 10. | CASES ON MCI’S IMPLIED POWERS: State of Kerala v. Kumari Roshana (1979) 1 SCC 572. | 179-189 |
| 11. | Preeti Srivastava v. State of MP -AIR 1999 SC 2894. | 190-216 |
| 12. | Mridul Dhar v. Union of India (2005) 2 SCC 65. | 217-227 |
| 13. | POST-UNNIKRISHNAN ORDERS RELIED UPON: Shahal H. Musaliar v. State of Kerala (1993) 4 SCC 112. | 228-231 |
| 14. | TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka WP (Civil) No.317/93. | 232 |
| 15. | TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (1993) 4 SCC 276. | 233-238 |
| 16. | TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (1993) 4 SCC 286. | 239-240 |
| 17. | TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (1993) 4 SCC 788. | 241-242 |
| 18. | TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (1995) 5 SCC 220. | 243-249 |
| 19. | State of Karnataka v. MAHE CA/5543-50 of 1996. | 250 |
| 20. | MAHE v. Union of India WP-23/99. | 251 |
| 21. | TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka WP(Civil) No. 317/93. | 252 |
| 22. | Manipal Academy of Higher Education v. (1) UOI (2) Medical Council of India, WP No.12673/2005 (EDN.) | 253-320 |
| MANIPAL – II Volume No. 156 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission – Manipal University v. Union of India – WP(C) No.13391/2008 | 1-30 |
| 2. | Summary of Arguments made to the Court – Manipal University v. UOI – WP(C) No.13391/2008. | 31-35 |
| 3. | Content of Reply and Final Submission – Manipal University v. UOI – WP(C) No.13391/2008. | 36-58 |
| 4. | Manipal University v. UOI – WP-12673 of 2005 ( of Cases): William Wade, Administrative Law (9th Edn., OUP, 2004). | 59-70 |
| 5. | Om Kumar v. Union of India (2001) 2 SCC 386. | 71-84 |
| 6. | Teri Oat Estate (P) Ltd. v. U.T., Chandigarh (2004) 2 SCC 130. | 85-95 |
| 7. | Manipal University v. UOI – WP (C) No.13391/2008: Establishment of New Medical Colleges Regulation 1993. | 96-102 |
| 8. | Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999. | 103-123 |
| 9. | Minimum Standard Requirements for the Medical College for 150 Admissions Annually Regulations, 1999. | 124-146 |
| 10. | Details of admission to MBBS course at Kasturba Medical College, Manipal and Kasturba Medical, Mangalore. | 147-150A |
| 11. | Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004) 8 SCC 1. | 151-163 |
| 12. | Shyam Sunder v. Ram Kumar (2001) 8 SCC 24. | 164-181 |
| 13. | K.S. Paripoornan v. State of Kerala (1994) 5 SCC 593. | 182-219 |
| 14. | Bihar State Council of Ayurvedic and Unani Medicine v. State of Bihar (2007) AIR SCW 7633. | 220-228 |
| 15. | Udai Singh Dagar v. UOI – AIR 2007 SC 2599. | 229-252 |
| 16. | Manipal University v. UOI – WP(C) No.13391/2008 (Re: Kesavan Kuty (2003) 8 SCC 490 and Its Repeal) Original order (2003) 8 SS 490 and Final Order 05.02.2009. | 253-259 |
| Volume-157 | ||
| S. No. | Particular | Page No. |
| 1. | Opinion – Om Prakash v. Union of India (2010) re: Chhattarpur by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate. | 1-8 |
| 2. | Synopsis – Dalchand Tyagi v. Union of India SLP(C) No.24934 of 2005 plus other SLP. | 9-18 |
| 3. | Narmada Bachao Andolan v. State of MP – Opinion by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan. | 19-35 |
| 4. | Opinion – Re: Review of Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate. | 36-44 |
| 5. | Opinion – Re: Ajay Jain by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan | 45-53 |
| 6. | Counter Affidavit – Re: A. Chitra v. K. Dhanasingh SLP 30471-2/2009 by Dr. Dhavan, Senior Advocate. | 54-72 |
| 7. | Re: B.L. Kapur Hospital. | 73-74 |
| 8. | Finance Commission Conditionalities on Releasing Grants – Preliminary aide-de-memoir by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate. | 75-82 |
| 9. | Written Submissions – R. Vijayan v. Baby by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate. | 83-126 |
| 10. | Further Submissions – R. Vijayan v. Baby by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate (Amicus Curiae). | 127-142 |
| 11. | Compilation by D.R Rajeev Dhavan, Senior Advocate – C. Govindrajan v. The Government of T.N. | 143-213 |
| 12. | Suggested Draft Order – Sri Balaji Nagar Residential Asson. V. Govt. of TN. | 214-219 |
| 13. | Re: Payal Jaipuria (For Malavika). | 220-221 |
| 14. | Opinion – A.B. Anandkar by Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sernior Advocate. | 222-230 |
| 15. | A note – SAF Yeast Co. P. Ltd. v. Lucien Lesaffre. | 231-234 |
| 16. | Opinion – Parmarth Internatinal School, Kangra | 235-237 |
| 17. | Submission – Manipal Academy of Higher Education and UOI. | 238-327 |
| 18. | Opinion – At the very outset – SC in the Constitution Bench in Nagaraj’s case (2006) 8 SCC 212 | 328-330 |
| 19. | Draft of Counter Affidavit – Re: A. Chitra v. K. Dhanasingh SLP-30471-2/2009. | 331-349 |
| Volume-158 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: State of Rajasthan vs. Bajrang Lal Sharma and Others | 1-26 |
| 2. | Opinion: Re- Jamia Milia Islamia | 27-28 |
| 3. | Submission on Arguments Made State of Rajasthan vs. Bajrang Lal Sharma | 29-36 |
| 4. | Special Leave Petition No. 30143 of 2009: Himachal Pradesh Scheduled Tribes Employees Freedom & Another vs. Himachal Pradesh S.V.K.K. Mahasangh and Others | 37-49 |
| 5. | Reserved! How Parliament Reservation | 50-66 |
| 6. | Uppalla Ranga Chary vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Cr. A. No. 1131/04 | 67-71 |
| 7. | Opinion: Re: Raghbir Singh | 72-94 |
| 8. | Opinion: Dr. Devendra Nath Tiwary vs. State of Jharkhand | 95-102 |
| 9. | Opinion: Re: School Uniform Contract Agreement of 12 May 2008 | 103-112 |
| 10. | Opinion: Ref: M/S Sahara India Commercial Ltd. vs. State of U.P. | 113-117 |
| 11. | Submission: made to Standing Committee on the Personal Laws (Amendment) Bill 2010 (PILSARC) | 118-135 |
| 12. | Opinion: Divorce Case Rupinder Mann vs. Gurpartap Singh Dish | 136-139 |
| 13. | Opinion: ANZ advanced Technologies LLC vs. Bush Hogh, LLC Civil Action No.09-228-KD-N | 140-151 |
| 14. | Opinion: Marc Galanter | 152-169 |
| 15. | Opinion: For UNCR Re: Query on the 1950 Friendship treaty Between India and Nepal | 170-180 |
| 16. | Opinion: State of Orissa vs. Smt. Harapriya Bisoi and Matter Related Thereto | 181-184 |
| 17. | Opinion: Re: Balaji Distilleries | 185-197 |
| 18. | Submission: Union of India vs. Chattro Devi | 198-207 |
| 19. | Submission: Union of India vs. Survinder Singh Khandhari & Suminder Singh Khandhari | 208-211 |
| 20. | Submission: National Seed Association of India vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others | 212-255 |
| 21. | Submission: Union of India vs. Survinder Singh Khandhari & Suminder Singh Khandhari | 256-259 |
| 22. | Opinion: Re; Balaji Distilleries | 260-272 |
| 23. | Written Argument on the Behalf of Petitioner Shri Athup Lecha vs. State of Sikkim and Others | 273-285 |
| Volume-159 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Opinion: Re: Telangana | 1-44 |
| 2. | Submission: SRM University vs. Government of India and UGC | 45-59 |
| 3. | Submission: Deepak Agarwal and Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh | 60-75 |
| 4. | Opinion: Re; Manipal University | 76-86 |
| 5. | Submission: Steel Authority of India vs. Ribyndu Bhattacharya | 87-97 |
| 6. | Jharkahnd Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India Schematic Representation of Fact by way of List of Dates | 98-105 |
| 7. | Submission: Jharkahnd Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India | 106-135 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re; A Bhunanenthiran vs. Union of India | 136-140 |
| 9. | Opinion: Dr. R.A. Yadav vs. Union of India | 141-144 |
| 10. | Submission: Chacko Kunjappan and Others vs. Babu Paul and Others | 145-151 |
| 11. | Opinion: ANZ advanced Technologies LLC vs. Bush Hogh, LLC Civil Action No.09-228-KD-N | 152-168 |
| 12. | Opinion: Re. Clarification Marc Galanter | 169-170 |
| 13. | Submission: Dr. Subramaniam Swami vs. R.V. Babu | 171-205 |
| 14. | Submission: Viplav Sharma vs. Union of India | 206-228 |
| 15. | Submission: A. Bhuvanendiran vs. Union of India | 229-245 |
| 16. | Submission: National Seed Association of India (NSAU) and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Others | 246-286 |
| 17. | Opinion: Belsund Sugar vs. State of Bihar | 287-292 |
| 18. | Submission: Tassadaq Hussain vs. Mohd. Rashid Qureshi and Others | 293-345 |
| Volume-160 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Opinion: Governor’s Power to Pardon Dr. Kheel Chisty , Kavita Shrivastava (1&2) | 1-23 |
| 2. | Opinion: Re: Saf Yeast and Agricole Bank | 24-36 |
| 3. | Submission: Rajender Singh vs. Sri Madhukar Dwivedi and Others | 37-55 |
| 4. | Opinion: Re: Lahore Hospital Society | 56-62 |
| 5. | Opinion: Re: National Institution of Fire Engineering (NIFE) | 63-72 |
| 6. | Submission: State of Madhya Paradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Another | 73-106 |
| 7. | Submission: Additional Submission on The Behalf of Dr. Rajeev Dhavan State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Another | 107-123 |
| 8. | Note/Opinion : Allahabad and Lucknow Bench | 124-127 |
| 9. | Submission: State of Madhya Paradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Another | 128-176 |
| 10 | Opinion: State of Madhya Paradesh vs. Narmada Bachao Andolan and Another | 177-192 |
| 11 | A Note: Rakesh Sharma and Others vs. State of Madhya and Others | 193-196 |
| 12 | Submission: Manipal Academy of Higher Education and Another vs. Union of India | 197-215 |
| 13 | Submission: Manipal University and Others vs. Union of India | 216-265 |
| 14 | Submission: SRM University vs. Govt. of India and UGC | 266-293 |
| Volume-161 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Comments /Notes (Law of Contempt) | 1-8 |
| 2. | Final Submission: Society for Un-aided Private School of Rajasthan vs. Union of India | 9-59 |
| 3. | Submission: Society for Un-aided Private School of Rajasthan vs. Union of India | 60-74 |
| 4. | Out Line of Submission in Reply to the Union of India | 75-106 |
| 5. | Submission on the Behalf of Petitioner Society for Un-aided Private School of Rajasthan vs. Union of India | 107-176 |
| 6. | Supplementary Written Submissions: Viplav Sharma vs. Union of India | 177-199 |
| 7. | Submission: Tamil Nadu vs. Shyam Sunder | 200-219 |
| Volume-162 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission-I: on the behalf of Respondent, Saf Yeast Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. Lucien Lesaffre and Others | 1-48 |
| 2. | Submission-II: on the behalf of Respondent, Saf Yeast Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. Lucien Lesaffre and Others | 49-54 |
| 3. | Preliminary Submission on Lokpal Bill-2011 Part-I | 55-105 |
| 4. | Further Submission as Directed by the Committee on Lokpal Bill- 2011 | 106-122 |
| 5. | Submission-I on Land Acquisition Bill 2011 | 123-232 |
| 6. | Submission-II on Land Acquisition Bill 2011 | 233-266 |
| 7. | Submission on Tribals, Tribal Land and land Acquisition | 267-300 |
| 8. | Submission : n land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill-2011 | 301-320 |
| Volume-163 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: on the behalf of Petitioner Jharkhand Ispat Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and Others | 1-6 |
| 2. | Submission on Repugnancy | 7-19 |
| 3. | Submission-I: In the Matter of West Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh | 20-50 |
| 4. | Submission-II: in the Matter of West Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh | 51-81 |
| 5. | Further Submission on Behalf of State of UP on Pricing and Statutory Amendment (Basti Sugar Mills vs. State of Uttar Pradesh) | 82-99 |
| 6. | Opinion Re: Reliance Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India | 100-102 |
| 7. | Opinion Re: Bharat Steel Tube vs. IFCI Ltd. | 103-124 |
| 8. | Submission: the State of Punjab vs. State of Haryana | 125-134 |
| 9. | Opinion: Sheel Kumar Jain vs. India Assurance Company Ltd. | 135-151 |
| 10. | Submission: State of U.P. vs. Karan Singh | 152-187 |
| 11. | Opinion Re: Mandira Saha vs. Dr. Ujjal Chatterjee | 188-194 |
| 12. | Opinion Re Dayal vs. Dayal | 195-200 |
| 13. | Submission: Hindustan Zinc | 201-210 |
| 14. | Opinion Re M/s Sahra India Commercial Ltd. vs. State of U.P. (Cover Note and Actual Opinion) | 211-216 |
| 15. | Submission: Union of India vs. State of Manipur | 217-242 |
| 16. | Opinion Re: Bush Hogg | 243-264 |
| 17. | Submission: Sagar Sugar vs. Transco AP | 265-274 |
| Volume-164 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: Sahara India real Estate Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Ex Change Board of India | 1-44 |
| 2. | Replay Submission: Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Ex Change Board of India | 45-64 |
| 3. | Written Submission: Bhupinder Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India | 65-88 |
| 4. | Opinion Re: A .P. Pricing and Trait Value | 89-90 |
| 5. | Opinion Re: Lokesh Shiva Kumar Vs. Karnataka | 91-93 |
| 6. | Submission: Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs. Shri Charan Das Mahant and Others. | 94-108 |
| 7. | Submission: Ishwardas Rohani Vs. Alok Mishra and Others (See Also Vol-165) | 109-126 |
| 8. | Preliminary Opinion: Re: Children Investment fund Management (TCIF) | 127-128 |
| 9. | Submission: Shri Salauddin Ahmed and Another vs. Samta Andolan and Others | 129-136 |
| 10. | Opinion: Re: Ruchita Puri’s MOU with Monty’s BV | 137-141 |
| 11. | Opinion: Re; Anticipating Bail | 142-145 |
| 12. | Submission: Purvankara Project Ltd. And Another Vs. State of Kerala and Another | 146-154 |
| 13. | Submission: Prem Kumar Singh & Others vs. State of U.P. | 155-159 |
| 14. | Submission: Singapore Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu | 160-204 |
| 15. | Opinion: Re: Lohia Developers Vs. Union of India (Himanshu Upadhaya ) | 205-222 |
| Volume-165 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: Speaker Haryana Vidhan Sabha Vs. Kuldeep Bishnoi Part-I | 1-58 |
| 2. | Submission: Speaker Haryana Vidhan Sabha Vs. Kuldeep Bishnoi Part-II | 59-67 |
| 3. | Submission: In the Matter of Ramlela Maidan Incident Part-I | 68-99 |
| 4. | Submission: In the Matter of Ramlela Maidan Incident Part-II | 100-138 |
| 5. | Submission: In the Matter of Ramlela Maidan Incident Part-III | 139-186 |
| 6. | Submission: In the Matter of Ramlela Maidan Incident Part-IV | 187-190 |
| 7. | Submission: State of U.P. Vs. Prem Kumar Singh and Others Part-I | 191-234 |
| 8. | Submission: State of U.P. Vs. Prem Kumar Singh and Others Part-II | 235-262 |
| 9. | Submission: State of U.P. Vs. Prem Kumar Singh and Others part-III | 263-278 |
| 10 | Submission: State of U.P. Vs. Prem Kumar Singh and Others | 279-283 |
| Volume-166 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Opinion: In The Matter of Cine Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd Vs. Registrar (J-II) Supreme Court of India | 1-3 |
| 2. | Submission: Dr. Ranjit Kumar & Other Vs. Union of India & Ors | 4-14 |
| 3. | Opinion: Dhrangadhra Prakruti Mandal Vs. Principal Secretary- Governor Gujarat | 15-16 |
| 4. | Opinion: Principal, Mount Carmel School Anand Niketan New Delhi-110021 | 17-19 |
| 5. | Opinion: Re: J.M.D. limited Vs. State of Goa | 20-31 |
| 6. | Opinion: Re: Avani Project and Infrastructure Ltd. | 32-39 |
| 7. | Opinion: Re; Further Clarification | 40-53 |
| 8. | Submission: Rajender Nagar Adarsh Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan | 54-80 |
| 9. | Opinion: Re: Fashion Design Council of India (FDCI) | 81-95 |
| 10 | Opinion: Surinder Singh Brar Vs. Union of India | 96-100 |
| 11. | Opinion Re: SIPCOT | 101-104 |
| 12. | Submission: Novartis AG Vs. Union of India (On the Behalf of CIPLA) | 105-117 |
| 13. | Opinion: Re: Dhrangadhra Prakruti Mandal Vs. Principal Secretary- Governor Gujarat Re: Gujarat Lokayukta Case (2012) | 118-119 |
| 14. | Written Submission: Sri Sri Kamakhya Nanan Sebait Samaj & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. | 120-127 |
| 15. | Written Submission: Sailen Sarma & Ors. Vs. State of Assam & Ors. | 128-135 |
| 16. | Opinion: Santosh Yadav, Papu Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar Through CBI | 136-148 |
| 17. | Written Submission: Bhupedra Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India | 149-173 |
| 18. | Opinion: Re: Settling Case of M/s D&A Stores Vs. Haryana Pollution Control Board & Ors | 174-181 |
| 19. | Submission: Dr. Ram Tawakya Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors | 182-196 |
| 20. | Submission: Ratan N. Tata Vs. Union of India & Ors | 197-222 |
| 21. | Submission Surinder Singh Brar & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors ( Section 5A of Land Acquisition) | 223-298 |
| 22. | Opinion: Re: Shivshankar Prasad Vs. D.A. Gopala | 299-306 |
| 23. | Note: In Ram Chandar Singh Vs. Savitri Devi & Ors | 307-311 |
| 24. | Submission: M/s PRP Export Vs. The chief Secretary & Ors | 312-323 |
| 25. | Note: On The Appeal to be Filed in Sultan UL Uloom Muzzam Jah | 324-326 |
| 26. | Submission: Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. Vs. Securities & Exchange Board of India | 327-350 |
| 27. | IRS: Indian Readership Survey (HANSA Research) | 351-364 |
| 28. | Opinion: Re: Samtha … Bill 2011 | 365-368 |
| 29. | Opinion: Re: Ruchita Puri | 369-370 |
| Volume-167 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: In the Matter of Ramlila Maidan Incident | 1-5 |
| 2. | Opinion: Re: Sunil Goel vs. Union of India | 6-20 |
| 3. | Submission: Re: Contract Engineers for the Upper Krishna Project | 21-33 |
| 4. | Submission: H.P. Schedule Tribals Employees Federation vs. State of H.P. S.L.P. (C) 30143/2009 | 34-38 |
| 5. | Opinion: Contrasting Article 371(D) and 371 (J) | 39-42 |
| 6. | Opinion: Re: Instate of Engineers (Institute) | 43-48 |
| 7. | Opinion: Further Query | 49 |
| 8. | Opinion: Advice on the draft Petition in the Proposed Case: Salil Maheshwari vs. High Court of Delhi | 50-52 |
| 9. | Opinion: Re: Applicability of Companies Bill 2012 to Sikkim | 53-63 |
| 10 | Opinion: MBS Jewellers (Musaddi Lal Group) | 64-69 |
| 11. | Opinion: Re: Brijesh | 70 |
| 12. | Submission: Revised Aid-De Memoire Re: Binny Ltd | 71-81 |
| 13. | Opinion: Use of the National Flag | 82-86 |
| 14. | Opinion: Re: Caetano Rosario Silva | 87-112 |
| 15. | Submission: Re: Binny Ltd. | 113-118 |
| 16. | Opinion: Re: Harrow Lease (Surender Kumar) | 119-123 |
| 17. | Submission: Santosh Sharma vs. Union of India & Ors. | 124-148 |
| 18. | Submission: National Seed Association of India (NSAI) & Ors. | 149-222 |
| 19. | Submission: Noida (Affidavits ) | 223-257 |
| 20. | Submission: Satya Narain Meena vs. Union of India & Ors. | 258-262 |
| 21. | Opinion: Malafide and Abdication of Discretion | 263-266 |
| 22. | Submission: Rajat Kanodia (Partner) M/S Classique International vs. Vinod Goel & Ors. | 267-271 |
| 23 | Submission: Mrs. Indu Sood & Ors. vs. Kiran Sood & Ors. | 272-298 |
| 24 | Submission: Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria & Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. | 299-321 |
| 25 | Opinion: In Re: Sultan Ul Uloom Muazzam Jha Trust | 322-324 |
| 26 | Submission: Ramdhan Mali & Anr vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. | 325-338 |
| 27 | Submission: Rajat Kanodia (partner M/S Classique International vs. Vinod Goel & Ors. | 339-344 |
| 28 | Submission: Ratan N. Tata vs. Union of India & Ors. | 345-364 |
| 29 | Submission: S.E.B.I. vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corp. Ltd. & Ors. | 365-400 |
| Volume-168 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: All India Council for Technical Education(AICTE) vs. Shri Prince Shivaji Maratha Boarding House College of Architecture | 1-30 |
| 2. | Final Submission With Annexure: All India Council for Technical Education(AICTE) vs. Shri Prince Shivaji Maratha Boarding House College of Architecture | 31-126 |
| 3. | Submission: All India Council for Technical Education(AICTE) vs. Shri Prince Shivaji Maratha Boarding House College of Architecture | 127-157 |
| 4. | Submission: Association of Management of Private Colleges vs. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) | 158-163 |
| 5. | Submission: Medical Council of India vs. Venepoya University T.P.( C) No 795-97 of 2012 | 164-209 |
| 6. | Reply Submission: Medical Council of India vs. Venepoya University T.P.( C) No 795-97 of 2012 | 210-228 |
| 7. | Short Submission: Medical Council of India vs. Venepoya University T.P.( C) No 795-97 of 2012 | 229-237 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re: B.R. Krishnamurthy (BRK) vs. M/s ITI Ltd. | 238-241 |
| 9. | Brief Submission in Rejoinder of Shri K. Parasaran Senior Advocate | 242-248 |
| 10 | Submission: Dalmia Cement Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu | 249-257 |
| 11. | Submission : Re: We Chat | 258-262 |
| 12. | Submission: Re Punjab Executive Bench Case | 263-290 |
| 13. | Submission: Re: Manipal Academy of higher Education (MAHE) | 291-295 |
| Volume-169 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Preliminary Submission: Ratan N. Tata vs. Union of India | 1-9 |
| 2. | Submission: Ratan N. Tata vs. Union of India | 10-82 |
| 3. | Submission: Ratan N. Tata vs. Union of India | 83-194 |
| 4. | Final Submission: Ratan N. Tata vs. Union of India | 195-232 |
| Volume-170 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Written Submissions for the Petitioner K.K. Singhal & Ors. Vs. M/s Steel Strips Ltd. | 1-11 |
| 2. | Submission: Manipal University Vs Union of India | 12-18 |
| 3. | Submission: Hilside Residents Welfare Association Vs State of Maharashtra | 19-22 |
| 4. | Opinion Re: Anjli Datta Et.al Vs. J.K. | 23-26 |
| 5. | Government of India Vs SRM University | 27-36 |
| 6. | Opinion TMA Pai and PA Inamdar | 37-38 |
| 7. | Opinion Re: Dinesh Reddy | 39-41 |
| 8. | Submission: Amarndra Kumar Mohapatra & Ors. Vs. State of Orissa & Ors. | 42-47 |
| 9. | Summary Submission: Amarndra Kumar Mohapatra & Ors. Vs. State of Orissa & Ors. | 48-49 |
| 10 | Aide-de-Memoire Amarndra Kumar Mohapatra & Ors. Vs. State of Orissa & Ors. | 50-52 |
| 11. | Submission: Hilside Residents Welfare Association Vs State of Maharashtra | 53-55 |
| 12. | Opinion: Re: Sahara Judgment of 4 June 2014 | 56-57 |
| 13. | Submission On Law: in the Matter of M/s Siemens Aktiengeseelschaft & Siemens Ltd. Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr. | 58-65 |
| 14 | Submission: M/s Harihar Contractors Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. | 66-146 |
| 15 | AICTE (List of Dates and Events) JRN Vs. Kartar Singh | 147-150 |
| 16 | Evidence Act, List of Cases | 151-154 |
| Volume-171 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: Dr. Rajeev Dhavan Vs. Gulshan Kumar Mahajan | 1-19 |
| 2. | Submission: S.C. Awasthi & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. | 20-59 |
| 3. | Opinion: Re: Smasi | 60-70 |
| 4. | Submission: S.C. Awasthi & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. | 71-75 |
| 5. | Opinion: Preliminary | 76-85 |
| 6. | Compilation of Submission: Shri Subrata Roy Sahraa Vs. Union of India & Anr. | 86-159 |
| Volume-172 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| Submission: Federation of Public Schools Vs. Union of India & Anr. | ||
| 1 | Extracts From Constituent Assembly Debates | 1-2 |
| 2. | Various Order Relevant to the Reference | 3-11 |
| 3. | Test of Basic Structure | 12-18 |
| 4. | Doctrine of Basic Structure | 19-23 |
| 5. | Table Showing Cases | 24-43 |
| 6. | Basic Submission on Article 21A and 15(5) | 44-93 |
| 7. | Analysis of the Children to free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 | 94-106 |
| 8. | Submission on Article 300 A | 107-115 |
| 9. | Parliament Debate Reservation 1995-2007 | 116-118 |
| 10. | Applying the Basic Structure Test | 119-130 |
| 11. | A workload fix for the Apex Court | 131-136 |
| 12. | Submission in Reply | 137-150 |
| Volume-173 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission in the Matter of Rattan Tata vs. Union of India | 1-42 |
| 2. | Submission on the Behalf of the Respondent No.6 Vipulabhbhai M. Choudhary vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. & Ors. | 43-93 |
| 3. | Submission on the Behalf of Intervener Cricket Association of Bihar vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors. | 94-107 |
| 4. | Submission in Reply On Conflict of Interest Cricket Association of Bihar vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors. | 108-120 |
| 5. | Further Compilation on the Behalf of the Respondent No.6 Vipulabhbhai M. Choudhary vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. & Ors. | 121-284 |
| 6. | Submission on the Behalf of the Respondent No.6 Vipulabhbhai M. Choudhary vs. Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. & Ors. | 285-335 |
| 7. | Submission in the Matter of Rattan Tata vs. Union of India | 336-373 |
| 8. | Submission for the Petitioner in the Matter of K.K. Singhal & Ors vs. M/s Steel Strips Ltd. | 374-384 |
| 9. | Opinion Re: Naturam Sharma vs. State of UP | 385-386 |
| 10 | Note by Respondent: in the Matter of Charu Mehta vs. Joint Charity Commission & Ors. | 387-392 |
| 11 | Opinion Re: on Tribunals Having the Trappings of a Court | 393 |
| 12 | Submission on the Behalf of Intervener Cricket Association of Bihar vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors. | 394-407 |
| Volume-174 | ||
| Sl No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Written Submission: Sri Raju Prasad Sarma Vs. State of Assam & Ors. | 1-23 |
| 2. | Written Submission: Sailen Sarma Vs. State of Assam & Ors. | 24-46 |
| 3. | Opinion: Re: Aarushi & (Judgment & Orders Dated 07/03/2013 NCT Of Delhi) | 47-84 |
| 4. | Final and Consolidated Submission on Behalf of the Government of NCT, Delhi | 85-110 |
| 5. | Opinion Re: Notification of the Central Government Dated 21st May 2015 | 111-122 |
| 6. | Re: Further Opinion of Section 44 of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act 1991(NCT, Act.) | 123-124 |
| 7. | Opinion: is as Follow (NCT of Delhi | 125-127 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re. Power of the Council of Ministers and the Lt. Governor | 128-135 |
| 9. | Written Submission: on the Behalf of the Petitioners Ms. Nisha Bagchi & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. | 136-140 |
| 10. | Opinion Re: Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly | 141-157 |
| 11. | Final and Consolidated Submission on Behalf of the Government of NCT, Delhi | 158-183 |
| 12. | Opinion: Re: Odisha Mining Corporation Limited | 184-198 |
| 13. | Further Submission of the Behalf of The Government of NCT, Delhi | 199-205 |
| 14. | Written Submission of the Behalf of Petitioner | 206-213 |
| 15. | Out Line Reply by the Government of NCT Delhi | 214-222 |
| 16. | Note By Respondent | 223-228 |
| 17. | Opinion: Re: Arena Superstructure Pvt. Ltd. | 229-233 |
| 18. | Opinion: Re: Odisha Mining Corporation | 234-249 |
| 19. | Brief Submission | 250-254 |
| 20. | Opinion: Re: Odisha Mining Corporation (OMC) Vs. Rio Tino (RT) | 255-259 |
| 21. | List of Dates Mira Dutta Bhowmik & Ors. Vs. Dilip Bhomik & Ors. | 260-284 |
| 22. | Submission: In the Matter of Jai Praksh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh | 285-304 |
| 23. | Reply to Submission Vipulabh M. Choudhary | 305-313 |
| 24. | Further Submission on Law in the Matter of Charu Kishore Mehta Vs. Joint Charity Commission & Ors. | 314-318 |
| 25. | Opinion Re: State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. H.P. Non-Gazetted Judicial Employee Welfare-Association & Anr. | 319-321 |
| 26. | Written Submission on the Behalf of the Petitioners in the Matter Executive Director Steel Authority of India Vs. Tycoon Traders | 322-327 |
| 27. | Opinion Re: Maharaja Agrasen Model School Vs. Workmen | 328-330 |
| 28. | Submission: In the Matter of: Hillside Residence Welfare Association & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. | 331-333 |
| 29. | Written Submission: In the Matter of: Hillside Residence Welfare Association & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. | 334-337 |
| 30. | Opinion: Re: UPL: Part-II | 338-339 |
| 31. | Opinion: Re: CSE Case | 340-344 |
| Volume-175 | ||
| Sl No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission-I: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 1-62 |
| 2. | Submission-II: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 63-83 |
| 3. | Submission-III: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 84-108 |
| 4. | Submission-IV: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 109-112 |
| 5. | Submission-IVA: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 113-116 |
| 6. | Submission-V: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 117-146 |
| 7. | Submission-VI: Subramanian Swami Vs. Union of India | 147-182 |
| 8. | Submission: In The Matter of Vijay Ghogare & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors | 183-214 |
| 9. | Submission: In The Matter of Vijay Ghogare & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors | 215-245 |
| 10. | Submission: Yenepoya University Vs. State of Karnataka | 246-323 |
| 11. | Submission: Runs Abraham Proprietor Hotel Rose International Vs. State of Kerala & Ors. | 324-346 |
| 12. | Submission: Anita International Vs. Tungabhadra Sugar Works Mazdoor Sangh | 347-367 |
| 13. | Submission State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. Vs. M/s Gupta Exports | 368-391 |
| 14. | Submission: Mira Dutta Bhowmik Vs. Dilip Dutta Bhowmik | 392-408 |
| 15. | Submission: Ms. Nisha Bagchi & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr. | 409-424 |
| 16. | Opinion: Re: Swami Vivekanad Subharti University’s Representation of in the Dental Council of India and Related Matters | 425-433 |
| 17. | Opinion: In Re: Andhra Pradesh Re-Organisation Act, 2014 & The Andhra Pradesh (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2015 | 434-446 |
| Volume-176(Arunachal Pradesh) | ||
| Sl No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Short Submission on the Behalf of Arunachal Pradesh | 1-6 |
| 2. | Long Submission on the Behalf of Arunachal Pradesh | 7-41 |
| 3. | Compilation | 42-216 |
| Volume-177(Arunachal Pradesh) | ||
| Sl No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission on the Behalf of the Nabam Rebia Vs. General Guhati High Court & Ors | 1-33 |
| 2. | Compilation on the Behalf of the Nabam Rebia Vs. General Guhati High Court & Ors | 34-209 |
| Volume-178 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: Ramakant Dwivedi Vs. Rafiq Ahmed& Ors | 1-3 |
| 2. | Submission on Behalf of Amicus Curie In I.A No. 67 of 2015: Noida Entrepreneurs Association V.s Noida & Ors. | 4-13 |
| 3. | Submission on Behalf of the Petitioners: Manmohan Singh Khuran Vs. Commodore T.S. Khurana & Ors. | 14-27 |
| 4. | Submission: State Election Commission Lucknow V.s Laluji Balkrishna Das | 23-26 |
| 5. | Opinion: Re: Moolchand Khairati Lal Trust V.s Union of India | 27-40 |
| 6. | Submission on Behalf of the Petitioners: Manipal University Vs. Union of India | 41-47 |
| 7. | Submission on Behalf of The State of Arunachal Pradesh | 48-52 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re: Defamation | 53-55 |
| 9. | Opinion Re: for the Attention of Jagjit Singh Chabhra Advocate on Record for the State of Punjab in Special Reference No.1 of 2014 | 56-57 |
| 10. | Opinion Re: UP Lukayukta and Up Lukayukta Act, 1975 | 58-68 |
| 11. | Submission on Law Article 300 A | 69-76 |
| 12. | Submission on Lapse of Acquisition: Meera Sahni Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi | 77-92 |
| 13. | Submission Dau Niranjan Lal Gupta Vs. State of Chhattisgarh | 93-98 |
| 14. | Written Submission Suresh Chand Gautam Vs. State of UP & Ors. | 99-123 |
| 15. | Submission: Arshdeep Singh Virk Vs. Trust Manave Kendra | 124-128 |
| 16. | Submission Vinod Rajaliwala Vs. Union of India | 129-136 |
| 17. | Opinion Re: Opinion on LMJ International Ltd Vs. Cliff Navigation | 137-151 |
| 18. | Submission: BGS Global Institute of Medical Science Vs. Union Of India | 153-157 |
| 19. | Written Submission Lalaram & Ors Vs. Jaipur Development Authority & Anr. | 158-169 |
| 20. | Opinion Settling Amendment to the Orissa’s Suit No.4 of 2007 in the Supreme Court | 170-175 |
| 21. | Submission Neon Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Medical Technologies Ltd. & Ors. | 176-180 |
| 22. | Submission: Suresh Chand Gautam Vs. State of UP | 181-183 |
| 23. | Submission: Shri Vijay Ghogare & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. | 184-214 |
| 24. | Submission: State of Maharashtra & Ors. Vs. Vijay Ghogare & Ors. | 215-275 |
| 25. | Submission Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Science Vs. Sachin Mehta | 2796-286 |
| 26. | Opinion: Malviak Rajkotia Advocate | 287 |
| 27. | Opinion Nayana Dhavan | 288-291 |
| 28. | Opinion for Association of Linguistic Minority Medical and Dental College in Karnataka | 292-296 |
| 29. | Submission: Gohi Vishvaraj Hanu Vs. State of Gujarat | 297-301 |
| Volume-179 | ||
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Submission: for Respondent: State of Tripura Vs. Jayant Chakraborty CA No. 4562-4817/2015 | 1-31 |
| 2. | Submission: of the Behalf of the Petitioner: Sopan Foundation Vs. Board of Council for Cricket in India | 32-60 |
| 3. | Opinion: Gujarat Unaided Schools Regulation Act, 2017 (Act of 2017) | 61-75 |
| 4. | Additional Submission: on Conclusions for the State of Bihar Distilleries & Bottles Pvt Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar (Liquor Ban) | 76-79 |
| 5. | Submission: on Conclusions for the State of Bihar Distilleries & Bottles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar (Liquor Ban) | 80-96 |
| 6. | Submission: B.K. Pavitra & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors. | 97-116 |
| 7. | Opinion: Re UCO Bank Vs. Deepak Deb Berma | 117-121 |
| 8. | Opinion: Re Majuli Cultural landscape Region (MCLR) Act of 2006 (Nalini Thakur) | 122 |
| 9. | Submission: M. Shivaswamy Vs. Union of India | 123-140 |
| 10 | Supplemientary Written Submission: of the Concept of “Creamy Layer” M. Shivaswamy Vs. Union of India | 141-148 |
| 11 | Submission: on the behalf of the Government of NCT of Delhi Vs. BSES Rajdhani Ltd. & Ors. | 149-172 |
| 12 | Submission: on the behalf of the Government of NCT of Delhi Vs. BSES Rajdhani Ltd. & Ors. | 173-180 |
| 13 | Written Submission: Hill View Colony & Ors. Vs. State of Nagaland | 181-184 |
| 14 | Submission: the UGC Act, 1956 and the AICTE Act, 1987 | 185-193 |
| 15 | Submission Orissa Lift Irrigation Corp. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Rabi Shankar Patro & Ors. | 194-200 |
| 16 | Submission Orissa Lift Irrigation Corp. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Rabi Shankar Patro & ors. | 201-210 |
| 17 | Opinion: re: Matter Arising from Common Cause Decision (2017) | 211-215 |
| 18 | Opinion: Re: Wine Merchants Assn. Karnataka | 216-217 |
Vol-180
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Reservation Matter – Whether M. Nagaraj (2006) 8 SCC 212; requires re-consideration in the matter of Jayant Chakraborty/ Sushil Kumar Singh/ Vijay Ghograe | |
| 2. | Reservation Matter – Response After hearing Towards Solution in the matter of Jayant Chakraborty/ Sushil Kumar Singh/ Vijay Ghogare | |
| 3. | Reservation Matter –B.K. Pavithra (W.P. (c) No.764 of 2018 · Dates · Balancing of Interest · Usurpation of Judicial Power · Compliance: Statutory Reversal | |
| 4. | Reservation Matter – Final Submission in B.K. Pavithra & Shiva Kumar KV [W.P. (c) No.764 & 791 of 2018) | |
| 5. | Guidelines of 16.01.2014 (TRAI) to Nizam Pasha, Adv. | |
| 6. | Re.: P. Mohamad Ali Convicted of an Offence – hold Directorship under Indian’s Company Act 2013 to Adv. EMS Anam | |
| 7. | State of Maharashtra v. Shro Radhe Mahila Bachat Gat, Lambola [SLP (c) No.29718 of 2016 | |
| 8. | Arshdeep Singh Virk v. Trust Manave Kendra – SPL No.9795 of 2013 | |
| 9. | Munna Lal v. UOI – SPL (C) No.15660 of 2014 | |
| 10. | Rohingya Refugee – Muhammed Salimullah v. UOI [WP (c) No.793 of 2017 – for Ravi Nair, SHRDC |
Vol-181
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Romila Thapar v. UOI (Dairy No. 32319 of 2018) Activist Case | |
| 2. | Notes on Settling Re.: Educational Promotion Society for India | |
| 3. | Girish Varma – Habitual Indebtedness – Supreme Court Order dated 13.12.2017 CA No.21838 of 2017 in SLP 24237 of 2013 | |
| 4. | Article 30 Propositions: Right of Minority to establish & Administer Educational Institutions) | |
| 5. | Aide-de-memoire Re.: Trafficking of Person (Prevention Protection and rehabilitation) Bill 2018 on Children born through Surrogacy | |
| 6. | Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India (SLP 26224 of 2016) (a) Preliminary Submission (pg.1-22) (b) Brief Note on “ANY” (pg. 1-2) (c) Proposition on the Executive Power of the GNCTD (d) Submission – Legislation & Rule (pg.1-20) | |
| 7. | Ayodhya Matter (CA no.10866 -67 of 2010) (a) Note on relevant Grounds in the Civil Appeal (pg.1-3) (b) Reference to larger Bench (pg. 1-24) (c) Islamic religious Text on Mosque & Quran (pg.1-24) (d) Reply on Reference to larger Bench (pg. 1-25) | |
| 8. | Opinion on Curative – Re.: Surinder Pal Singh | |
| 9. | Notes on Sanjiv Chaturvedi (Dr. Kaushal Kant Mishra) | |
| 10. | Re.: Police Case – UP Police requirement case – (Piyush Adv.) |
Vol-182
| S. No. | Particulars | Page No. |
| 1. | Reservation Matter – · Submission in Reply (February –March 2019) B.K. Pavithra & Shiva Kumar KV [W.P. (c) No.764 & 791 of 2018) · Reply to Replies After the Hearing on 06.03.2019 Submission in Reply (Feb.2019) B.K. Pavithra & Shiva Kumar KV [W.P. (c) No.764 & 791 of 2018)
| |
| 2. | P.L. Batra’s Son [Jogesh Batra – YMCA] Opinion – I, II & III | |
| 3. | 103rd Constitutional Amendment – (AG, KK Venugopal] Question for the Constitution Bench | |
| 4. | Aide-de-Memoire – DIMTS –Adv. Rashi Anand | |
| 5. | Bihar Agriculture Land Conversion to Non Agriculture Act, 2010 | |
| 6. | C.V. Raman College of Engineering v. Biju Patnaik University of Technology – SLP 17765-66 of 2012 | |
| 7. | AICTE v. Shri Prince Shivaji Maratha Boarding House College of Architecture | |
| 8. | Parmodh Kumar Sharma v. State of Haryana [SLP no.34043 of 2011 | |
| 9. | M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das (Ayodhya)- Note for hearing on 06.03.2019 | |
| 10. | Comments on the Impleadment Application – Mohd. Aslam case – Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi (Ayodhya) |